Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Optical Control of Living Cells Electrical Activity by Conjugated Polymers
Published on: January 28, 2016
A Predictive Approach for the Optical Control of Carbonic Anhydrase II Activity
Kateri H DuBay1, Katharina Iwan2, Laura Osorio-Planes3
1Department of Chemistry , University of California at Berkeley , Berkeley , California 94720 , United States.
Abstract:
Optogenetics and photopharmacology are powerful approaches to investigating biochemical systems. While the former is based on genetically encoded photoreceptors that utilize abundant chromophores, the latter relies on synthetic photoswitches that are either freely diffusible or covalently attached to specific bioconjugation sites, which are often native or engineered cysteines. The identification of suitable cysteine sites and appropriate linkers for attachment is generally a lengthy and cumbersome process. Herein, we describe an in silico screening approach that is designed to propose a small number of optimal combinations. By applying this computational approach to human carbonic anhydrase and a set of three photochromic tethered ligands, the number of potential site-ligand combinations was narrowed from over 750 down to 6, which we then evaluated experimentally. Two of these six combinations resulted in light-responsive human Carbonic Anhydrases (LihCAs), which were characterized with enzymatic activity assays, mass spectrometry, and X-ray crystallography. Our study also provides insights into the reactivity of cysteines toward maleimides and the hydrolytic stability of the adducts obtained.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity
The Carbon Cycle
Carbon Skeletons
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

