Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG
Published on: March 10, 2017
Spatial variation in high-frequency oscillation rates and amplitudes in intracranial EEG
Hari Guragain1, Jan Cimbalnik1, Matt Stead1
1From Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology (H.G., M.S., B.M.B., V.K., D.K.-J., J.B., G.A.W., B.H.B.), and Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering (B.M.B., V.K., G.A.W., B.H.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; International Clinical Research Center (J.C.), St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic; The Krembil Neuroscience Centre (D.M.G.), Toronto, Canada; and Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics (V.K.), Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Objective:
To assess the variation in baseline and seizure onset zone interictal high-frequency oscillation (HFO) rates and amplitudes across different anatomic brain regions in a large cohort of patients.
Methods:
Seventy patients who had wide-bandwidth (5 kHz) intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings during surgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy between 2005 and 2014 who had high-resolution MRI and CT imaging were identified. Discrete HFOs were identified in 2-hour segments of high-quality interictal iEEG data with an automated detector. Electrode locations were determined by coregistering the patient's preoperative MRI with an X-ray CT scan acquired immediately after electrode implantation and correcting electrode locations for postimplant brain shift. The anatomic locations of electrodes were determined using the Desikan-Killiany brain atlas via FreeSurfer. HFO rates and mean amplitudes were measured in seizure onset zone (SOZ) and non-SOZ electrodes, as determined by the clinical iEEG seizure recordings. To promote reproducible research, imaging and iEEG data are made freely available (msel.mayo.edu).
Results:
Baseline (non-SOZ) HFO rates and amplitudes vary significantly in different brain structures, and between homologous structures in left and right hemispheres. While HFO rates and amplitudes were significantly higher in SOZ than non-SOZ electrodes when analyzed regardless of contact location, SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes were not separable in some lobes and structures (e.g., frontal and temporal neocortex).
Conclusions:
The anatomic variation in SOZ and non-SOZ HFO rates and amplitudes suggests the need to assess interictal HFO activity relative to anatomically accurate normative standards when using HFOs for presurgical planning.
More Related Videos
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016
06:50Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
Published on: October 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
What is Variation?
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Oscillations In An LC Circuit
Forced Oscillations