Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Modeling The Lifecycle Of Ebola Virus Under Biosafety Level 2 Conditions With Virus-like Particles Containing Tetracistronic Minigenomes
Published on: September 27, 2014
Post-exposure treatments for Ebola and Marburg virus infections
Robert W Cross1,2, Chad E Mire1,2, Heinz Feldmann3
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Abstract:
The filoviruses - Ebola virus and Marburg virus - cause lethal haemorrhagic fever in humans and non-human primates (NHPs). Filoviruses present a global health threat both as naturally acquired diseases and as potential agents of bioterrorism. In the recent 2013-2016 outbreak of Ebola virus, the most promising therapies for post-exposure use with demonstrated efficacy in the gold-standard NHP models of filovirus disease were unable to show statistically significant protection in patients infected with Ebola virus. This Review briefly discusses these failures and what has been learned from these experiences, and summarizes the current status of post-exposure medical countermeasures in development, including antibodies, small interfering RNA and small molecules. We outline how our current knowledge could be applied to the identification of novel interventions and ways to use interventions more effectively.
Insights
Ebola and Marburg virus hemorrhagic fevers pose significant threats. Recent Ebola therapies effective in animal models failed in human patients, highlighting the need for improved medical countermeasures.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Filoviruses, including Ebola virus and Marburg virus, cause severe hemorrhagic fevers in humans and non-human primates (NHPs).
- These viruses represent a substantial global health risk due to natural outbreaks and potential bioterrorism applications.
- Previous promising post-exposure therapies, effective in NHP models, did not achieve statistically significant protection during the 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the failures of recent Ebola therapies in human patients.
- To review lessons learned from these therapeutic setbacks.
- To summarize the current landscape of developing post-exposure medical countermeasures against filoviruses.
Main Methods:
- Review of scientific literature and clinical trial data related to filovirus therapies.
- Analysis of efficacy data from NHP models versus human patient outcomes.
- Synthesis of information on ongoing development of antibodies, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and small molecule therapeutics.
Main Results:
- Therapies successful in NHP models for filovirus disease did not demonstrate statistically significant protection in human Ebola patients.
- Significant knowledge gaps and challenges exist in translating preclinical findings to clinical success.
- Several classes of medical countermeasures, including antibodies, siRNA, and small molecules, are under active development.
Conclusions:
- Past therapeutic failures provide critical insights for future research and development.
- Improved strategies are needed for identifying and effectively deploying novel filovirus interventions.
- Further research is essential to develop robust and clinically validated post-exposure treatments for filovirus infections.
Related Concept Videos
What are Viruses?
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Introduction to Virus
Viruses of Archaea

