ASPRE trial: incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia in patients fulfilling ACOG and NICE criteria according to risk by

L C Poon1,2, D L Rolnik3, M Y Tan3,4

  • 1King's College London, London, UK.

Insights

Screening for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) using National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) or American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) criteria, but not the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, significantly reduces PE risk. This supports personalized risk-based screening.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Diagnostic Accuracy

Background:

  • Preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) poses significant risks to maternal and fetal health.
  • Current screening guidelines, such as those from NICE and ACOG, identify women at risk.
  • The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm offers a comprehensive screening method combining maternal factors and biomarkers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of preterm PE in women identified as screen-positive by NICE and ACOG criteria.
  • To compare this incidence with that in women screened by the FMF algorithm (both screen-positive and screen-negative).
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the FMF algorithm in risk stratification for preterm PE.

Main Methods:

  • Secondary analysis of data from the ASPRE study.
  • Inclusion of 34,573 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing prospective screening for preterm PE at 11-13 weeks' gestation.
  • Calculation of preterm PE incidence based on NICE, ACOG, and FMF screening criteria.

Main Results:

  • Women meeting NICE or ACOG criteria but screening negative by FMF algorithm had a significantly reduced incidence of preterm PE (0.25% for ACOG, 0.65% for NICE high-risk, 0.42% for NICE moderate-risk).
  • The relative incidence of preterm PE in FMF screen-negative versus screen-positive individuals was consistently low across criteria (0.051 to 0.085).
  • The FMF algorithm demonstrated superior risk stratification compared to NICE and ACOG criteria alone.

Conclusions:

  • Screening positive by ACOG or NICE criteria but negative by the FMF algorithm indicates a substantially reduced risk of preterm PE.
  • These findings reinforce the value of personalized, risk-based screening using a combination of maternal factors and biomarkers.
  • The FMF algorithm provides a more accurate risk assessment for preterm PE.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
435
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
42.5K
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
1.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.1K