Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Premature birth and circadian preference in young adulthood: evidence from two birth cohorts
Johan Björkqvist1,2, Anu-Katriina Pesonen3, Liisa Kuula3
1a Department of Public Health Solutions , National Institute for Health and Welfare , Helsinki and Oulu , Finland.
Insights
Adults born preterm do not show differences in circadian preference, like being a night owl, compared to those born at term. This study used objective sleep data and subjective questionnaires to assess sleep timing and chronotype across gestation ranges.
Area of Science:
- Chronobiology
- Perinatal Medicine
- Sleep Science
Background:
- Preterm birth and eveningness preference share health risks.
- Association between preterm birth and circadian preference is not well understood.
- Previous studies suggest potential links, but comprehensive data across gestation is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between preterm birth and circadian preference.
- To utilize both objective (actigraphy) and subjective (questionnaire) measures.
- To examine this association across the full spectrum of gestational age.
Main Methods:
- Compared sleep midpoint (objective) and chronotype (subjective) in young adults born early preterm (<34 weeks), late preterm (34-<37 weeks), and at term (≥37 weeks).
- Included very low birth weight (VLBW) participants for comparison.
- Analyzed data using linear regression and Pearson chi-squared tests.
Main Results:
- No consistent differences in objective sleep midpoint were found between preterm-born and term-born groups.
- Subjective chronotype distribution (morning, intermediate, evening) did not differ significantly across gestational age groups.
- Gestational age group and VLBW status did not influence subjective chronotype scores.
Conclusions:
- This study found no significant association between preterm birth (early or late) and circadian preference in young adulthood.
- Findings suggest that previously observed links in extremely preterm infants may not generalize to the broader preterm population.
- Circadian preference is not consistently altered by preterm birth across the entire gestational range.
Abstract:
A preference for eveningness (being a "night owl") and preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation) are associated with similar adversities, such as elevated blood pressure, impaired glucose regulation, poorer physical fitness, and lower mood. Yet, it remains unclear if and how preterm birth is associated with circadian preference. The aim of this study was to assess this association across the whole gestation range, using both objective and subjective measurements of circadian preference. Circadian preference was measured among 594 young adults (mean age 24.3 years, SD 1.3) from two cohorts: the ESTER study and the Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study. We compared 83 participants born early preterm (<34 weeks) and 165 late preterm (34 to <37 weeks) with those born at term (≥37 weeks, n = 346). We also compared very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) participants with term-born controls. We obtained objective sleep data with actigraphs that were worn for a mean period of 6.8 (SD 1.4) nights. Our primary outcome was sleep midpoint during weekdays and weekend. The sleep midpoint is the half-way time between falling asleep and waking up, and it represents sleep timing. We also investigated subjective chronotype with the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) in 688 (n = 138/221/329) ESTER participants. The MEQ consists of 19 questions, which estimates the respondent to be of a "morning", "evening," or "intermediate" chronotype, based on the Morningness-Eveningness Score (MES). We analyzed the data from the actigraphs and the MES with three linear regression models, and analyzed distribution of the chronotype class with Pearson χ2. There were no consistent differences across the study groups in sleep midpoint. As compared with those born at term, the mean differences in minutes:seconds and 95% confidence intervals for the sleep midpoint were: early preterm weekdays 11:47 (-8:34 to 32:08), early preterm weekend 4:14 (-19:45 to 28:13), late preterm weekdays -10:28 (-26:16 to 5:21), and late preterm weekend -1:29 (-20:36 to 17:37). There was no difference in sleep timing between VLBW-participants and controls either. The distribution of chronotype in the MEQ among all participants was 12.4% morningness, 65.4% intermediate, and 22.2% eveningness. The distribution of the subjective chronotype class did not differ between the three gestational age groups (p = 0.98). The linear regression models did not show any influence of gestational age group or VLBW status on the MES (all p > 0.5). We found no consistent differences between adults born early or late preterm and those born at term in circadian preference. The earlier circadian preference previously observed in those born smallest is unlikely to extend across the whole range of preterm birth.
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
The Evidence for Evolution
Emerging Adulthood
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adulthood
Intimacy Versus Isolation in Early Adulthood
Individuals in early...

