Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Multi-step Variable Height Photolithography for Valved Multilayer Microfluidic Devices
Published on: January 27, 2017
Good at One or Good at All? Variability of Coronary and Valve Operation Outcomes Within Centers
Lily E Johnston1, Emily A Downs1, Robert Hawkins1
1Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Insights
Center performance in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and heart valve surgery outcomes do not correlate for mortality. However, morbidity rates show a strong correlation, suggesting postoperative care impacts both procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Technical expertise for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and structural heart valve disease treatment differs.
- A correlation between center-specific mortality rates for CABG and valve operations has not been established.
- This study investigated whether risk-adjusted outcomes for coronary and valve procedures correlate within institutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that risk-adjusted outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and heart valve operations do not correlate within medical centers.
- To analyze the relationship between institutional performance in CABG and valve procedures.
- To identify potential determinants of patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multi-institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database (2008-2015) including isolated CABG, aortic valve replacement (AVR), and mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures.
- Calculated observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for morbidity and mortality based on STS predicted risks for each institution and procedure.
- Employed linear regression models to assess the relationship between institutional performance in CABG and valve operations.
Main Results:
- Analyzed 22,258 procedures (17,026 CABG, 3,238 AVR, 1,994 MVR) across 18 institutions.
- Weak correlation coefficients were observed for mortality: 0.22 (AVR vs. CABG) and 0.26 (MVR vs. CABG).
- A strong relationship was found for morbidity O/E ratios: 1.03 (AVR) and 0.97 (MVR), indicating a nearly 1:1 correlation between institutional morbidity for CABG and valve operations.
Conclusions:
- Institutions with low CABG mortality rates may not exhibit similarly low valve operation mortality rates.
- A striking, nearly identical O/E ratio for morbidity was observed for CABG and valve operations at each center.
- These findings suggest that postoperative care is a significant determinant of morbidity following cardiac operations.
Background:
The technical expertise required for treatment of coronary and structural heart valve disease differs. Correlation between center-specific mortality rates after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve operations has not been demonstrated. This study tested the hypothesis that risk-adjusted outcomes between coronary and valve procedures do not correlate within centers.
Methods:
Records of patients undergoing isolated CABG, isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), or isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) procedures from 2008 to 2015 in a multi-institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database were used to generate observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for morbidity and death. Ratios were based on the STS predicted risks of morbidity and death and were calculated by procedure for each institution. Linear regression models evaluated the relationship between institutional performance in CABG and valve operations.
Results:
A total of 22,258 records from 18 institutions were analyzed: 17,026 CABG, 3,238 isolated AVR, and 1,994 MVR procedures. With respect to deaths, the correlation coefficients were weak; for AVR and CABG, it was 0.22 and was 0.26 for MVR and CABG. With respect to morbidity, a strong relationship was seen between the morbidity O/E ratios, with coefficients of 1.03 for AVR and 0.97 for MVR, suggesting a nearly 1:1 relationship between morbidities observed in an institution's CABG and valve operations.
Conclusions:
Sites that perform CABG with low mortality rates may not have similarly low mortality rates with valve operations. Most striking, however, is the nearly identical O/E ratio for morbidity for CABG and valve operations at each center. These findings suggest postoperative care as a major determinant for morbidity after cardiac operation.
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

