Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Minimal Invasive Surgical Procedure of Inducing Myocardial Infarction in Mice
Published on: May 4, 2015
Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and
Shunda Wang1, Ning Shi, Lei You
1Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Safety and feasibility remain controversial when comparing MIPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of MIPD versus OPD.
Methods:
A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies comparing MIPD and OPD. Postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes and oncologic data, and postoperative recovery were compared.
Results:
There were 27 studies that matched the selection criteria. Totally 1306 cases of MIPD and 5603 cases of OPD were included. MIPD was associated with a reduction in postoperative hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.49; P = .04) and wound infection (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.66, P < .0001). MIPD was also associated with less estimated blood loss (mean difference [MD] -300.14 mL, 95% CI -400.11 to -200.17 mL, P < .00001), a lower transfusion rate (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61; P < .00001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (MD -2.95 d, 95% CI -3.91 to -2.00 d, P < .00001) than OPD. Meanwhile, the MIPD group had a higher R0 resection rate (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.78, P = .0003) and more lymph nodes harvested (MD 1.34, 95% CI 0.14-2.53, P = .03). However, the minimally invasive approach proved to have much longer operative time (MD 71.00 minutes; 95% CI 27.01-115.00 minutes; P = .002) than OPD. Finally, there were no significant differences between the 2 procedures in postoperative pancreatic fistula (P = .30), delayed gastric emptying (P = .07), bile leakage (P = .98), mortality (P = .88), tumor size (P = .15), vascular resection (P = .68), or reoperation rate (P = .11).
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that MIPD is currently safe, feasible, and worthwhile. Future large-volume, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCT) with extensive follow-up are awaited to further clarify this role.
Insights
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is safe and feasible compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). MIPD offers reduced complications and shorter hospital stays, despite longer operative times, making it a valuable surgical option.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a complex procedure with debated safety and feasibility compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD).
- Evaluating the comparative outcomes of MIPD and OPD is crucial for surgical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the existing literature comparing MIPD and OPD.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of MIPD versus OPD in terms of postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes, oncologic data, and recovery.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review identifying studies comparing MIPD and OPD.
- Meta-analysis of postoperative complications, intraoperative outcomes, oncologic data, and postoperative recovery.
Main Results:
- MIPD demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative hemorrhage and wound infection.
- MIPD was associated with less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, and shorter hospital stays.
- While operative time was longer for MIPD, R0 resection rates and lymph node yield were higher, with no significant differences in pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage, or mortality.
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a safe, feasible, and beneficial surgical approach.
- Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended to solidify the role of MIPD.
Related Concept Videos
Chemical Equilibria: Systematic Approach to Equilibrium Calculations
The first step is to identify all the chemical reactions involved, The...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

