Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Risk of intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a population-based study
Mohamad A Hussain1,2, Aziz S Alali3,4, Muhammad Mamdani5,6,7,8,9
11Division of Vascular Surgery.
Insights
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is linked to a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This rare complication, though more frequent after CAS, necessitates further research for risk mitigation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious complication of carotid revascularization.
- Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome can lead to ICH post-procedure.
- Comparing risks between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of ICH within 90 days following CAS versus CEA.
- To evaluate the association between CAS and ICH risk relative to CEA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2015).
- Inclusion of 16,688 patients undergoing carotid artery revascularization.
- Statistical analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity scores.
Main Results:
- ICH occurred in 0.85% of CAS patients versus 0.42% of CEA patients.
- Adjusted analysis showed CAS significantly increased ICH risk (aOR 1.77).
- Findings remained consistent across sensitivity analyses and subgroups.
Conclusions:
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- Despite being rare, the increased ICH risk with CAS warrants attention.
- Further research is needed to develop strategies for minimizing ICH risk after carotid revascularization.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVEIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is a rare but major complication of carotid artery revascularization. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of ICH after carotid artery stenting (CAS) with that after endarterectomy (CEA).METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients who underwent carotid artery revascularization in the province of Ontario, Canada, between 2002 and 2015. The primary outcome was the rate of ICH that occurred within 90 days after carotid artery intervention among patients who underwent CAS versus that of those who underwent CEA. The authors used inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity scores to account for selection bias. In sensitivity analyses, patients who had postprocedure ischemic stroke were excluded, and the following subgroups were examined: patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, patients treated between 2010 and 2015, and patients aged ≥ 66 years (to account for antiplatelet and anticoagulant use).RESULTSA total of 16,688 patients underwent carotid artery revascularization (14% CAS, 86% CEA). Patients with more comorbid illnesses, symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, or cardiac disease and those who were taking antiplatelet agents or warfarin before surgery were more likely to undergo CAS. Among the overall cohort, 80 (0.48%) patients developed ICH within 90 days (0.85% after CAS, 0.42% after CEA). The 180-day mortality rate after ICH in the overall cohort was 2.7%, whereas the 180-day mortality rate among patients who suffered ICH was 42.5% (40% for CAS-treated patients, 43.3% for CEA-treated patients). In the adjusted analysis, patients who underwent CAS were significantly more likely to have ICH than those who underwent CEA (adjusted OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.32-2.36; p < 0.001). These results were consistent after excluding patients who developed postprocedure ischemic stroke (adjusted OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.41-2.56) and consistent among symptomatic (adjusted OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.16-2.63) and asymptomatic (adjusted OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.16-2.63) patients with carotid artery stenosis, among patients treated between 2010 and 2015 (adjusted OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.45-3.38), and among the subgroup of patients aged ≥ 66 years (adjusted OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.05-2.24) after adjusting for medication use.CONCLUSIONSCAS is associated with a rare but higher risk of ICH relative to CEA. Future research is needed to devise strategies that minimize the risk of this serious complication after carotid artery revascularization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Population Genetics?
What are Populations and Communities?
Population Growth
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

