Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Development During Adolescence01:18

Cognitive Development During Adolescence

654
During adolescence, individuals experience significant cognitive development that enhances their understanding of others' emotions and thoughts, known as cognitive empathy. This period is marked by an increased ability to adapt to others' perspectives and a more nuanced understanding of others' mental states, a skill that is foundational for social problem-solving and conflict avoidance. The development of cognitive empathy relies heavily on the theory of mind — the...
654
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence01:17

Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence

1.3K
Erik Erikson's fifth stage of psychosocial development, "identity versus role confusion," is crucial during adolescence (ages 12 to 18). In this stage, adolescents face the developmental task of forging a distinct personal identity, a process influenced by social, psychological, and biological changes typical of this period. Adolescents naturally explore different roles, behaviors, and ideologies as they navigate complex questions of self-concept, asking, "Who am I?" and "What is my place in...
1.3K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

409
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
409
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.8K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.8K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.5K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.5K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The prevalence of food insecurity and its relationship with wellbeing in a large, cross-sectional study of children and young people in England.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

A digitally embedded intervention to enhance psychological decentering and reduce depression severity in at-risk adolescents: a randomised controlled trial of the 'One Step Back' programme.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

When doctors do not care.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Collective Risk Taking in Adolescents and Young Adults: Adolescents Take More Risks When Deciding Collectively Than Alone.

Journal of adolescence·2026
Same author

Addressing rates of low mood and anxiety among adolescent girls: Co-production of programme theories with adolescent girls and professionals.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026
Same author

The Longitudinal Relationship Between Self-Reported Executive Function and Mental Health in Early Adolescence.

JAACAP open·2026
Same journal

Neural timescales from a computational perspective.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Spinal cord Tau pathology induces tactile deficits and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease via dysregulation of CCK neurons.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal theta sweeps indicate goal direction during navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Just how goal-directed are hippocampal theta sweeps, anyway?

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Goal-directed hippocampal theta sweeps during memory-guided navigation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Connectomic evidence that ordered activity drives neuromuscular network formation.

Nature neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.9K

Studying individual differences in human adolescent brain development.

Lucy Foulkes1,2, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore3

  • 1UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK.

Nature Neuroscience
|February 7, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adolescent neurocognitive development varies significantly between individuals. Future research should focus on these individual differences, not just averages, using large datasets to understand brain changes.

More Related Videos

Derivation of a Human Brain Organoid with Microglia Development
10:34

Derivation of a Human Brain Organoid with Microglia Development

Published on: January 17, 2025

2.1K
Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice
07:06

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.9K
Derivation of a Human Brain Organoid with Microglia Development
10:34

Derivation of a Human Brain Organoid with Microglia Development

Published on: January 17, 2025

2.1K
Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice
07:06

Chronic Social Defeat Stress in Early Adolescent Male Mice

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Adolescent Development

Background:

  • Adolescence involves significant social, psychological, and biological changes.
  • Brain structure and function undergo parallel transformations during this period.
  • Current research often overlooks individual variations in adolescent neurodevelopment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a shift in adolescent neurocognitive research towards studying individual differences.
  • To highlight the importance of understanding variation in neurodevelopmental trajectories.
  • To propose methods for assessing these individual differences.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on adolescent neurocognitive development.
  • Discussion of structural and functional brain variations.
  • Examination of socioeconomic status, culture, and peer environment as sources of variation.

Main Results:

  • Individual differences in brain development are substantial and meaningful.
  • Factors like socioeconomic status, culture, and peer interactions significantly influence neurocognitive processing.
  • Large-scale longitudinal datasets are crucial for tracking individual developmental trajectories.

Conclusions:

  • Focusing on averages obscures critical individual variations in adolescent neurodevelopment.
  • Future research must characterize individual differences for a more comprehensive understanding.
  • Developmental neuroimaging studies should prioritize individual variation analysis.