The effect of wearing jeans on maximum static lifting strength for men and women at various exertion heights
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Diabetes Research with Static Exercise Training in Mice
Published on: March 29, 2024
Yi-Lang Chen1,2, Chia-Ying Li1, Chao-Hsuan Wang3
1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, Taiwan.
Abstract:
This study collected maximum static lifting strength (MSLS) data from 13 males and 13 females at an exertion height of 10-100 cm above the floor (in 10-cm increments) in wearing athletic shorts and wearing jeans conditions. Knee angles were also examined when participants performed the MSLS tasks. Results showed that gender, pant type and exertion height significantly affected participants' MSLS and corresponding knee angle. The effect of wearing jeans primarily occurred at 10-40 cm; meanwhile, male participants tended to stoop while exerting force. This substantially decreased their MSLS (55 N). For female participants in this exertion height range, no significant difference was found in knee angles; accordingly, wearing jeans only slightly affected their MSLS. In summary, wearing jeans had a noticeable effect on the MSLS of male participants, who should be particularly careful when performing lifting tasks at a height of less than 50 cm above the floor.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lift
Maximum Deflection
The maximum deflection occurs at a specific point, known as point O, where the tangent to the deflection curve is horizontal. To find point O, the slope of the tangent at any...
Static Equilibrium - I
Static Equilibrium - II
Static Friction
For example, consider a scenario where a truck is connected to a car by a rope, ready to tow it along a road. When no external force is applied by the truck, the car remains stationary and is said to be in static equilibrium. In this case, the forces acting on the car, such as gravity and the...
Maximum Power Transfer
By substituting the entire circuit with...

