Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Transaxillary First Rib Resection for Treatment of the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Published on: September 13, 2020
An In Vitro Biomechanical Study on Ovine Rib Flexibility With Increasing Deconstruction-As an Alternative to Rib
Matthew Hughes1, Jason Bernard2, Matthew Szarko1
1St Georges, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.
Study Design:
An in vitro biomechanical study into the effect of rib deconstruction on the flexibility in ovine ribs, using three-point bending.
Objective:
To examine the feasibility and possible effectiveness of a more conservative costoplasty using an in vitro animal model.
Summary Of Background Data:
Costoplasty remains useful in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, rib hump, and associated chest wall deformities. However, traditional costoplasty increases morbidity and blood loss.
Methods:
Ribs 2-10 were dissected from four fresh half ovine rib cages. The ribs were randomly allocated to Groups 1 to 4. The ribs underwent deconstruction, 10 mm from the lateral tubercle and 30 mm long, according to their group: Group 1 = control; Group 2 = convex cortical bone removed; Group 3 = convex cortical and cancellous bone removed; Group 4 = all but the ventral cortex is removed. Flexibility was tested by loading the concave side of each rib while fixed at the rib head and equidistant from the center of the resected area. The ribs were deformed at 0.5 mm/s up to a maximum load of 9.99 kg or fracturing. Load was plotted against displacement to find the load/displacement coefficient for each group. Statistical analysis was by an analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc testing.
Results:
The load/displacement coefficients were as follows: Group 1 = 131.93 (±27.52) N/mm, Group 2 = 93.36 (±40.71) N/mm, Group 3 = 88.66 (±25.84) N/mm, and Group 4 = 29.69 (±29.11) N/mm. Group 4 was significantly less stiff than Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p < .01). No ribs in Groups 1, 2, and 4 fractured. Five of 8 ribs in Group 3 fractured during loading.
Conclusions:
Deconstructing the rib down to the concave side significantly increases the flexibility by approximately 4.5 times. Despite large removal of bone, it retains the ability to withstand 10 kg of load without fracture.
Related Concept Videos
The Thoracic Cage: Ribs
Parts of a Typical Rib
A typical rib has a head, neck, and body. The posterior end of the rib is called the head, followed by a narrow neck. The head articulates primarily with the costal...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Alternative Methods
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
Alternative RNA Splicing
Increasing Function
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...

