Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Cell-Free DNA Integrity Analysis in Urine Samples
Published on: January 5, 2017
How to Integrate Cell-Free DNA Screening With Sonographic Markers for Aneuploidy: An Update
Thomas C Winter1, Nancy C Rose2
11 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Utah Health Sciences, 30 N 1900 E, Rm 1A071, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2140.
Ultrasound soft markers in fetal anatomy scans are becoming less critical for genetic screening. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is revolutionizing prenatal screening, with normal results often making isolated markers irrelevant.
Area of Science:
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Prenatal Diagnostics
- Medical Ultrasound
Background:
- Sonologists identify soft markers in ~10% of second-trimester anatomy scans.
- Management of these findings, such as choroid plexus cysts (CPCs) and echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF), can be uncertain.
- This review focuses on six common sonographic markers: CPCs, ventriculomegaly (VM), EIF, urinary tract dilation (UTD), fetal echogenic bowel (FEB), and limb shortening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline appropriate management strategies for patients with specific sonographic soft markers.
- To review the role and integration of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening in the context of these ultrasound findings.
- To clarify the genetic and non-genetic implications of isolated versus associated soft markers.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical guidelines regarding sonographic soft markers.
- Analysis of the diagnostic utility of cell-free DNA screening in conjunction with ultrasound findings.
- Discussion of the management pathways for specific fetal anomalies detected via ultrasound.
Main Results:
- Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly replacing traditional ultrasound markers for aneuploidy screening.
- Normal cfDNA results diminish the genetic significance of many isolated soft markers like CPCs and EIF.
- Certain findings, including VM, true FEB, significant limb shortening, and pyelectasis, still warrant further investigation for non-genetic causes.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound markers are transitioning from primary aneuploidy screens to indicators for offering cfDNA testing.
- Isolated soft markers with normal cfDNA results are generally considered low-risk for aneuploidy.
- Further workup is recommended for specific markers to assess non-genetic associations, and positive cfDNA screens require diagnostic confirmation.
Related Concept Videos
Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals
Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals
DNA Topoisomerases
Types and Mechanism of action
Topoisomerases are divided into two main types. ...
DNA Isolation
DNA Packaging
Complementary DNA

