Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

11:14
Ex Vivo Infection of Human Lymphoid Tissue and Female Genital Mucosa with Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 and Histoculture
Published on: October 12, 2018
Transplant Infectious Diseases Work Standards-Results From a Mid-Atlantic Regional Survey
Nicole C Vissichelli1, Lora Thomas1, Rebecca Kumar2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Summary
Transplant infectious diseases (TID) work standards often mirror general infectious diseases, despite unique demands. Tailored standards are crucial for fair compensation, physician retention, and attracting specialists to this complex field.
Area of Science:
- Transplant Infectious Diseases
- Medical Workforce Analysis
- Clinical Practice Standards
Background:
- The expanding fields of transplantation and cellular therapy necessitate a growing Transplant Infectious Diseases (TID) workforce.
- Current regional or national work standards for the existing TID workforce are not well-defined.
- This study aims to establish current work standards for a 1.0 FTE (full-time equivalent) practice in TID.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline current work standards for Transplant Infectious Diseases (TID) clinicians.
- To evaluate the compensation structure for TID providers.
- To inform the development of tailored work standards for the TID field.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to October 2025.
- A REDCap survey was distributed to members of the Mid-Atlantic Transplant Infectious Diseases Society (MATIDS).
- Data from 18 multiple-choice questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Excel and R.
Main Results:
- Physicians reported a blend of RVU (relative value unit) and time-based models for defining work standards.
- For a 1.0 FTE, most reported 26-30 weeks of inpatient service in academic centers (31-35 for all respondents).
- Most physicians received subsidized cFTE (clinical full-time equivalent) support, with significant non-billable work for transplant programs.
Conclusions:
- TID work standards are frequently aligned with general Infectious Diseases (ID) despite distinct patient populations and consultation demands.
- Existing standards do not adequately account for the unique non-billable workload in TID.
- Developing specialized TID work standards is essential for fair compensation, physician retention, and attracting new specialists.