Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Experimental Viral Infection in Adult Mosquitoes by Oral Feeding and Microinjection
Published on: July 28, 2022
Randomized trial of earlier versus later oral feeding in very premature infants
Ann Gerges1,2, Polina Gelfer3,4, Kathleen Kennedy3,4
1Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. gerges@bcm.edu.
Insights
Starting oral feeding earlier in very premature infants at 30 weeks
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatrics
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Very premature infants (<29 weeks' gestation) often face challenges with oral feeding.
- Timely initiation of oral feeding is crucial for infant development and hospital discharge.
- Current feeding protocols for extremely preterm infants require evaluation for optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if initiating oral feeding earlier in very premature infants leads to earlier achievement of full oral feeds.
- To assess if earlier oral feeding initiation impacts the timing of hospital discharge in this population.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early oral feeding protocols in very premature infants.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial was conducted with very premature infants (<29 weeks' gestation).
- Infants were randomized at 30 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) to either an earlier (30 weeks' PMA) or later (33 weeks' PMA) oral feeding initiation group.
- Primary outcomes included PMA at full oral feedings and PMA at hospital discharge.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the PMA at full oral feedings between the earlier and later feeding groups (mean difference -0.5 weeks).
- Similarly, no significant difference was found in the PMA at hospital discharge between the two groups (mean difference -0.2 weeks).
- Initiating oral feeding at 30 weeks' PMA was found to be safe for infants not experiencing severe tachypnea or requiring positive pressure ventilation.
Conclusions:
- Early oral feeding initiation at 30 weeks' PMA does not accelerate the achievement of full oral feedings or hospital discharge in very premature infants.
- The practice is safe for select very premature infants who are hemodynamically stable and not experiencing significant respiratory distress.
- These findings suggest that current feeding guidelines may not need adjustment based solely on earlier initiation of oral feeding attempts.
Objectives:
To ascertain if earlier oral feeding initiation results in earlier attainment of full oral feedings/hospital discharge in very premature infants.
Study Design:
Eligible infants born at <29 weeks' gestation were randomized at 30 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) to initiate oral feedings at 30 weeks' PMA (Earlier Oral Feeding Group) versus 33 weeks' PMA (Later Oral Feeding Group).
Results:
Thirty-four infants were randomized to the Earlier Oral Feeding Group and 32 to the Later Oral Feeding Group. There were no significant differences in our primary outcomes of PMA at full oral feedings (mean difference -0.5 weeks, 95% CI: -2.2 to +1.2 weeks) or hospital discharge (mean difference -0.2 weeks, 95% CI: -1.8 to +1.4 weeks).
Conclusions:
Initiating oral feeding attempts in very premature infants at 30 weeks' PMA does not result in earlier attainment of full oral feedings or discharge but is safe for infants who are not severely tachypneic or receiving positive pressure.
Related Concept Videos
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

