Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.0K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.5K
Responses to Gravity and Touch02:26

Responses to Gravity and Touch

42.0K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
42.0K
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

1
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
1
Humoral Immune Responses01:36

Humoral Immune Responses

84.2K
Overview
84.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgeon General's Warning: Gender Is Bad for Your Health.

The Hastings Center report·2019
Same author

Bioethicists to the Barricades!

Bioethics·2019
Same author

Family Members' Existential and Moral Dilemmas With Coercion in Mental Healthcare.

Qualitative health research·2018
Same author

In the Matter of Stories.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2017
Same author

Why families matter.

Pediatrics·2014
Same author

Where families and healthcare meet.

Journal of medical ethics·2014
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity
08:37

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

Published on: October 25, 2016

7.4K

The Intimate Responsibility of Surrogate Decision-Making.

Hilde Lindemann

    The Hastings Center Report
    |February 20, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    In medical treatment decisions, a surrogate

    More Related Videos

    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
    08:16

    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

    Published on: May 9, 2016

    11.1K
    Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
    09:17

    Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

    Published on: March 28, 2025

    2.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

    Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity
    08:37

    Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

    Published on: October 25, 2016

    7.4K
    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
    08:16

    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

    Published on: May 9, 2016

    11.1K
    Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
    09:17

    Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

    Published on: March 28, 2025

    2.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical Law
    • Philosophy of Medicine

    Background:

    • Bioethical discourse often centers on patient autonomy and surrogate decision-making rights.
    • Existing frameworks analyze surrogate authority based on knowledge of the patient's interests.
    • Daniel Brudney's analysis distinguishes between patient and surrogate rights in medical treatment decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine Brudney's epistemological and moral arguments regarding patient and surrogate decision-making rights.
    • To critically evaluate the basis of surrogate authority in medical treatment decisions.
    • To propose an alternative ethical foundation for proxy decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of Brudney's arguments on patient autonomy and surrogate knowledge.
    • Ethical reasoning to differentiate between epistemological and moral justifications for decision-making.
    • Critique of knowledge-based claims for surrogate authority, proposing intimacy as a key factor.

    Main Results:

    • Brudney posits that both patients and surrogates have decision-making rights based on knowledge (self-knowledge for patients, knowledge of the patient for surrogates).
    • Brudney argues the moral basis differs: patient decisions are autonomous, while surrogate decisions are grounded in superior knowledge of the patient.
    • The critique suggests intimacy, rather than knowledge, is the primary moral basis for surrogate decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Brudney's epistemological and moral arguments for surrogate decision-making rights are analyzed.
    • The study challenges the sufficiency of knowledge as the sole moral justification for surrogate authority.
    • Intimacy is proposed as a more robust ethical foundation for proxy medical treatment decisions.