Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
A simulation study on estimating biomarker-treatment interaction effects in randomized trials with prognostic
1Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany. bernhard.haller@tum.de.
Including relevant prognostic variables in randomized clinical trials increases the power to detect biomarker-treatment interactions. Careful selection is crucial to avoid bias and false positives in time-to-event outcome analyses.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Individualizing treatment decisions requires identifying biomarker-treatment interactions.
- Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are often used to analyze these interactions.
- Statistical power for interaction tests in RCTs can be limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how considering additional prognostic variables impacts the power and bias of biomarker-treatment interaction estimates.
- To evaluate different analytical approaches for handling prognostic factors in time-to-event outcomes within RCTs.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted to assess the effect of prognostic factors on biomarker-treatment interaction estimates.
- Scenarios varied in censored observations, covariate correlations, and interaction strength.
- Approaches included ignoring, including all, or using variable selection for covariates.
Main Results:
- Including prognostic variables associated with the outcome increases the probability of detecting true biomarker-treatment interactions.
- Omitting relevant prognostic variables leads to biased interaction estimates.
- Inadequate variable selection or inclusion of too many predictors increases false-positive rates.
Conclusions:
- Conducting a thorough literature search for prognostic variables pre-analysis is recommended.
- Pre-specifying analyses enhances power for detecting interactions and avoids selective reporting.
- Adequate consideration of prognostic variables improves the reliability of biomarker-treatment interaction findings in RCTs.
Related Concept Videos
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

