Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Combining Wet and Dry Lab Techniques to Guide the Crystallization of Large Coiled-coil Containing Proteins
Published on: January 6, 2017
Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical carotid plaque MR protocol using a neurovascular coil compared to a surface coil
Waleed Brinjikji1,2, J Kevin DeMarco3, Robert Shih3
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Background:
Carotid plaque imaging with MRI is becoming more commonplace, but practical challenges exist in performing plaque imaging with surface coils.
Purpose:
To compare the diagnostic performance of a carotid plaque MRI protocol using a standard neurovascular coil (Neurovascular Coil Protocol) to a higher-resolution carotid plaque MRI using carotid surface coils (Surface Coil Protocol) in characterizing carotid plaque.
Study Type:
Prospective study comparing two MR techniques in plaque characterization.
Population:
Thirty-eight consecutive carotid artery disease patients.
Field Strength/Sequence:
Patients underwent 3T MRI using 1) a Neurovascular Coil Protocol including the following sequences: 3D-FSE T1 pre/postcontrast and precontrast 3D IR-FSPGR, and 2) a Surface Coil Protocol using standard multicontrast MRI sequences.
Assessment:
Plaque characteristics analyzed by two independent neuroradiologists included intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic-core (LRNC), and thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC).
Statistical Tests:
Diagnostic performance of the Neurovascular Coil Protocol was compared to the Surface Coil Protocol reference standard using receiver-operating curves.
Results:
For IPH, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the Neurovascular Coil Protocol were 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78.8-97.5%), 87.0% (95% CI = 66.4-97.2%), and 0.92, respectively. For LRNC without IPH sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 73.3% (95% CI = 44.9-92.2%), 85.7% (95% CI = 67.3-96.0%), and 0.84, respectively. For TRFC, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 35.3% (95% CI = 14.2-61.7%), 97.6% (95% CI = 87.4-99.9%), and 0.66 respectively. Interobserver agreement for IPH, LRNC, and TRFC using the Neurovascular Coil Protocol were k = 0.87 (95% CI = 0.75-0.99), k = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.29-0.80), and k = 0.41 (95% CI = 0.08-0.74), respectively.
Data Conclusion:
Our Neurovascular Coil Protocol has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in identifying IPH and LRNC but is limited in assessment of TRFC.
Level Of Evidence:
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1264-1272.
Insights
The Neurovascular Coil Protocol demonstrates high accuracy for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) in carotid plaques. However, its effectiveness is limited in assessing thin or ruptured fibrous caps (TRFC).
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Carotid plaque imaging using MRI is increasingly common.
- Challenges exist in performing plaque imaging with surface coils.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of a standard neurovascular coil protocol versus a higher-resolution surface coil protocol for carotid plaque characterization.
- To evaluate the ability of each MRI protocol in identifying key plaque components.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study compared two MRI protocols in 38 patients with carotid artery disease.
- Protocols included a standard neurovascular coil and carotid surface coils at 3T MRI.
- Plaque characteristics analyzed were intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic-core (LRNC), and thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC).
Main Results:
- The Neurovascular Coil Protocol showed high sensitivity and specificity for IPH (AUC=0.92) and LRNC (AUC=0.84).
- Performance for thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC) was limited (AUC=0.66).
- Interobserver agreement was substantial for IPH (k=0.87) and moderate for LRNC (k=0.54) and TRFC (k=0.41).
Conclusions:
- The Neurovascular Coil Protocol is effective for identifying IPH and LRNC in carotid plaques.
- Assessment of TRFC using the Neurovascular Coil Protocol requires further improvement.
- This protocol offers a viable alternative for carotid plaque characterization, particularly for IPH and LRNC detection.
More Related Videos
10:52Design, Instrumentation and Usage Protocols for Distributed In Situ Thermal Hot Spots Monitoring in Electric Coils using FBG Sensor Multiplexing
Published on: March 8, 2020
07:00How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests