Transcriptomic studies in tolerance: Lessons learned and the path forward

Sunil M Kurian1, Thomas C Whisenant1, James M Mathew2

  • 1Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA; Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Human Immunology
|February 27, 2018
PubMed

Immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation is a delicate balance of the immune response and is a complex phenomenon with many factors involved. Despite advances in the care of patients receiving organ transplants the adverse effects associated with immunosuppressive agents and the risks of long-term immunosuppression present a series of challenges and the need to weigh the risks and benefits of either over or under-immunosuppression. Ideally, if all transplant recipients could develop donor-specific immunological tolerance, it could drastically improve long-term graft survival without the need for immunosuppressive agents. In the absence of this ideal situation, the next best approach would be to develop tools to determine the adequacy of immunosuppression in each patient, in a manner that would individualize or personalize therapy. Despite current genomics-based studies of tolerance biomarkers in transplantation there are currently, no clinically validated tools to safely increase or decrease the level of IS that is beneficial to the patient. However, the successful identification of biomarkers and/or mechanisms of tolerance that have implications on long-term graft survival and outcomes depend on proper integration of study design, experimental protocols, and data-driven hypotheses. The objective of this article is to first, discuss the progress made on genomic biomarkers of immunological tolerance and the future avenues for the development of such biomarkers specifically in kidney transplantation. Secondly, we provide a set of guiding principles and identify the pitfalls, advantages, and drawbacks of studies that generate genomic data aimed at understanding transplant tolerance that is applicable to all solid transplants.

Related Concept Videos

Mean free path and Mean free time01:22

Mean free path and Mean free time

Consider the gas molecules in a cylinder. They move in a random motion as they collide with each other and change speed and direction. The average of all the path lengths between collisions is known as the "mean free path."
5.3K
Path Between Thermodynamics States01:21

Path Between Thermodynamics States

Consider the two thermodynamic processes involving an ideal gas that are represented by paths AC and ABC in Figure 1:
4.1K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.2K
Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion03:48

Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion

Although gaseous molecules travel at tremendous speeds (hundreds of meters per second), they collide with other gaseous molecules and travel in many different directions before reaching the desired target. At room temperature, a gaseous molecule will experience billions of collisions per second. The mean free path is the average distance a molecule travels between collisions. The mean free path increases with decreasing pressure; in general, the mean free path for a gaseous molecule will be...
31.4K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.7K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.5K