Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Technical Aspects of the Mouse Aortocaval Fistula
Published on: July 11, 2013
Technical aspects and limitations of fractional flow reserve measurement
Stepan Jerabek1, Tomas Kovarnik1
1a 2nd Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine , Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague , Praha , Czech Republic.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) accurately detect ischemia-causing coronary lesions. This guide details best practices and technical challenges for accurate FFR and iFR measurements in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Coronary revascularization aims to eliminate myocardial ischemia.
- Invasive hemodynamic assessments like fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) surpass coronary angiography in identifying ischemia-inducing lesions.
- European guidelines recommend FFR for functional assessment of lesion severity (Category IA), with increasing procedural use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive summary of best clinical practices for FFR and iFR measurements.
- To elucidate potential technical challenges encountered during FFR and iFR assessments.
- To enhance the accuracy of FFR and iFR measurements through improved understanding of technical requirements and limitations.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and guidelines on FFR and iFR.
- Analysis of common technical pitfalls and malpractice in invasive hemodynamic assessments.
- Synthesis of practical recommendations for accurate FFR and iFR procedures.
Main Results:
- FFR and iFR are crucial for accurate diagnosis of functionally significant coronary artery disease.
- Technical factors significantly impact the reliability and accuracy of FFR and iFR measurements.
- Adherence to standardized protocols and awareness of limitations are essential for optimal outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Frequent technical errors and suboptimal practices occur during invasive lesion severity assessments.
- Implementing standardized best practices for FFR and iFR is vital for improving diagnostic accuracy.
- Further education and training on technical aspects are necessary for interventional cardiologists.
Background:
The only indication for coronary revascularization is elimination of ischaemia. Invasive hemodynamic methods (fractional flow reserve - FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are superior to coronary angiography in detection of lesions causing myocardial ischaemia. Current European guidelines for myocardial revascularization recommend using of FFR for detection of functional assessment of lesions severity in category IA and number of these procedures increases. However, routine usage of these methods requires knowledge of technical requirements and limitations.
Aim:
The aim of the study is to summarise good clinical practice for FFR and iFR measurements with explanation of possible technical challenges, that are necessary for increasing of measurement accuracy.
Conclusions:
Authors describe frequent technical mistakes and malpractice during invasive assessment of lesion severity in coronary arteries.
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Limiting Reactant
The Number e as a Limit
Types of Limits I
Limit Laws I
Limits at Infinity

