Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Blind Endotracheal Intubation in Neonatal Rabbits
Published on: February 26, 2021
Validation of a Postextubation Dysphagia Screening Tool for Patients After Prolonged Endotracheal Intubation
Karen L Johnson1, Lauri Speirs2, Anne Mitchell2
1Karen L. Johnson is research director, nursing, Banner Health, Phoenix, Arizona. Lauri Speirs is stroke clinical nurse specialist, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas. Anne Mitchell is a clinical nurse specialist, retired from Banner Baywood Medical Center, Mesa, Arizona. Heather Przybyl is a clinical education specialist; medical/surgical intensive care unit, Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona. Diane Anderson is a speech language pathologist and rehabilitation services senior manager, Banner Baywood Medical Center. Brenda Manos is senior clinical manager cardiac care unit/intensive care unit, Banner Estrella Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona. Amy T. Schaenzer is a speech language pathologist, Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix. Keri Winchester is a speech language pathologist, Banner Gateway Medical Center, Gilbert, Arizona. Karen.johnson2@bannerhealth.com.
Background:
Patients who receive prolonged endotracheal intubation (> 48 hours) are at risk for dysphagia. Nurses should conduct swallowing assessments after extubation because of the high likelihood of aspiration pneumonia developing. No valid and reliable postextubation dysphagia screening tools are available.
Objectives:
To establish content validity, analyze interrater reliability, and determine sensitivity and specificity of an evidence-based postextubation dysphagia screening tool developed by a multidisciplinary team.
Methods:
A prospective nonexperimental study was conducted in 4 medical-surgical intensive care units in 4 hospitals. The study was conducted in 3 phases: (1) establishing content validity with clinical experts who participated in a Delphi survey, (2) establishing inter-rater reliability by agreement with nurses who simultaneously and independently completed the tool, and (3) establishing sensitivity and specificity with speech language pathologists and nurses who independently and blindly completed the tool for eligible patients.
Results:
Individual item scores were > 0.82 and the overall content validity index was 0.93, indicating content validity. Interrater reliability was established (Cohen κ = 0.92). In 66 eligible patients, the prevalence of postextubation dysphagia was 56%, sensitivity of the postextubation dysphagia screening tool was 81%, and specificity was 69%.
Conclusion:
The reliability and validity of a postextubation dysphagia screening tool that can help nurses determine an extubated patient's ability to swallow after prolonged endotracheal intubation were established.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
Reliability and Validity
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

