[Comparison of the NoSAS score with four different questionnaires as screening tools for obstructive sleep...

Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of the NoSAS score in the screening of patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS), and to compare the performance of the NoSAS score with other tools including Epworth Sleepiness Scale(ESS), STOP, STOP-Bang(SBQ) and Berlin questionnaires. Methods: A total of 444 consecutive patients(328 males and 116 females) with suspected OSAHS who underwent an overnight polysomnography(PSG) were recruited into this study. Five questionnaires including the NoSAS score, ESS, STOP, SBQ and Berlin were completed. Based on the severity of OSAHS which was determined by apnea-hypopnea index(AHI), the patients were classified into 4 groups: normal(<5 events/h), mild(5-15 events/h), moderate(15-30 events/h) and, severe (≥30 events/h) OSA.Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 5 questionnaires were calculated. Results: With AHI≥5 events/h as the standard diagnosis of OSAHS, the NoSAS score and SBQ questionnaire showed a moderate performance, with the NoSAS score having the largest area under the ROC curve(0.753, P<0.001), followed by the SBQ questionnaire (0.727, P<0.001). The performance of the ESS, Berlin, and the STOP questionnaire was not high. Using mild moderate-severe(≥5 events/h), moderate-severe(≥15 events/h), and severe(≥30 events/h)OSAHS as cutoffs, NoSAS had the highest specificity and positive predictive values(80.2% and 88%, 72% and 69.8%, 66.3% and 50.5%), and the sensitivity and negative predictive values were (51.5% and 36.9%, 56.5% and 59.1%, 66.3% and 74.2%) .SBQ had the highest sensitivity and the negative predictive values(80.2% and 88%, 72% and 69.8%, 66.3% and 50.5%), and the specific and positive predictive values were (45.7% and 81.0%, 39.1% and 61.9%, 34.8% and 44.4%). The NoSAS score ≥ 7 had higher sensitivity and negative predictive value(75.0% and 47.1%, 78.1% and 66.5%, 82.7% and 81.9%)than the NoSAS socre ≥ 8. With AHI≥5 events/h as the standard diagnosis of OSAHS, the NoSAS score and the SBQ questionnaire had a higher accuracy than the other 3 questionnaires as screening questionnaires for diagnosing OSAHS, and the value of DOR were 4.298 and 3.758 respectively. Conclusions: The NoSAS score and the SBQ questionnaire have a moderate performance in diagnosing OSAHS. The NoSAS score is a new screening tool, and it is similar to the SBQ questionnaire, being also simple and effective. While the SBQ questionnaire is more widely used, it is necessary to further evaluate the diagnostic value of NoSAS score.