Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Comparison of three classifications for lymph node evaluation in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for
Johannes Fritzmann1, Pietro Contin2, Christoph Reissfelder3
1Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. johannes.fritzmann@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Purpose:
The present study compared the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and the 6th and the 7th TNM edition as three different lymph node classifications for rectal cancer patients.
Methods:
A total of 630 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for primary rectal cancer between October 2001 and December 2007 were included. Prognostic factors of overall survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results:
The median follow-up was 36.1 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 70.3 ± 4.7%. The median number of lymph nodes was 15.0 (12.0-19.0). All three lymph node evaluations correlated with survival (p < 0.0001). The assessment of nodal status in the 7th TNM edition enabled further prognostic stratification. The prognostic value of the three classifications were independent of neoadjuvant therapy and lymph node count. On multivariate analyses, the N2 stage of the 6th TNM edition (Hazard ratio 2.08; 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.58) and the N2b stage of the 7th TNM edition (2.18; 1.17-4.07) correlated with poor survival. A LNR of 0.42-0.69 was also associated with unfavorable prognosis (2.97; 1.46-6.03), as was an LNR > 0.69 (2.51; 1.04-6.05). The LNR did not provide prognostic information in addition to the N stage of the TNM classifications.
Conclusions:
The evaluated lymph node classifications were of comparable prognostic utility in patients with rectal cancer. The LNR did not provide prognostic information in addition to the N stage of the TNM classifications.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
05:52Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:23Detailed Structure and Function of Lymph Nodes
From a histological perspective, lymph nodes can be split into two main areas: the superficial cortex and the deep medulla. The outer cortex is populated by dendritic cells, macrophages, and B lymphocytes, which are densely packed into follicles. When these B-lymphocytes are presented...
01:54Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
01:54Base Excision Repair
01:08Nucleotide Excision Repair
01:38Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
01:30Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation