Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins02:36

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

11.1K
Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...
11.1K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

28.2K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.2K
RNA Splicing01:32

RNA Splicing

60.7K
Splicing is the process by which eukaryotic RNA is edited before its translation into protein. The RNA strand transcribed from eukaryotic DNA is called the primary transcript. The primary transcripts that become mRNAs are called precursor messenger RNAs (pre-mRNAs). Eukaryotic pre-mRNA contains alternating sequences of exons and introns. Exons are nucleotide sequences that code for proteins, whereas introns are the non-coding regions. In RNA splicing, introns are removed and exons are bonded...
60.7K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

35.8K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
35.8K
Types of RNA01:23

Types of RNA

73.0K
Overview
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs perform diverse functions and can be broadly classified as protein-coding or non-coding RNA. Non-coding RNAs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in response to developmental and environmental changes. Non-coding RNAs in prokaryotes can be manipulated to develop more effective antibacterial drugs for human or animal use.
RNA...
73.0K
Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases00:58

Eukaryotic RNA Polymerases

27.2K
RNA Polymerase (RNAP) is conserved in all animals, with bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic RNAPs sharing significant sequence, structural, and functional similarities. Among the three eukaryotic RNAPs, RNA Polymerase II is most similar to bacterial RNAP in terms of both structural organization and folding topologies of the enzyme subunits. However, these similarities are not reflected in their mechanism of action.
All three eukaryotic RNAPs require specific transcription factors, of which the...
27.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DDI-MMAF: Multi-modal affine fusion of visual and semantic representations for anticancer drug synergy prediction.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Population-Level Trends in Lung Cancer Mortality and Stage Distribution During the USPSTF LDCT Guideline Era: A Multi-Database Quasi-Experimental Study.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2026
Same author

Trends, underlying-cause structure, and penetration of end-stage kidney disease involvement in U.S. mortality, 1999-2023: a multiple-cause-of-death analysis.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Integrating Multi-View Residue Graph and Protein Language Model for Cell-Penetrating Peptide Prediction via Global-Local Graph Aggregation and Cross-Attentive Fusion.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2026
Same author

Label tree semantic losses for rich multi-class medical image segmentation.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Complement C5a/C5aR1 pathway facilitates glioblastoma progression via fostering glioma stem cell-macrophage symbiosis.

Journal of neuroinflammation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

7.2K

Inferring RNA sequence preferences for poorly studied RNA-binding proteins based on co-evolution.

Shu Yang1, Junwen Wang2, Raymond T Ng3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. syang11@cs.ubc.ca.

BMC Bioinformatics
|March 14, 2018
PubMed
Summary

We developed a new co-evolution method to predict RNA-binding protein (RBP) sequence preferences without needing experimental binding data. This approach infers preferences for poorly studied RBPs, offering an economical alternative to current methods.

Keywords:
Co-evolutionK-nearest neighborsMachine learningRBP binding preference

More Related Videos

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation
12:26

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.9K
PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins
12:24

PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins

Published on: July 2, 2010

54.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

7.2K
Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation
12:26

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.9K
PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins
12:24

PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins

Published on: July 2, 2010

54.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally.
  • Experimental determination of RBP binding preferences is crucial but data is lacking for many RBPs.
  • Existing computational methods require experimental binding data, limiting their application to well-studied RBPs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational method for predicting RBP sequence preferences.
  • To overcome the limitation of requiring experimental binding data for poorly studied RBPs.
  • To infer RBP binding preferences using co-evolutionary information.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstrated co-evolutionary relationships between RBPs and their RNA targets.
  • Developed a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) based algorithm to infer sequence preferences from homologous RBPs.
  • Benchmarked the KNN method against existing approaches using in vitro and in vivo datasets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed KNN method successfully inferred RBP sequence preferences without experimental data.
  • The method outperformed existing alternatives that use only the closest neighbor's preference.
  • Performance was comparable to state-of-the-art methods that require experimental binding data.
  • Successfully applied the method to infer preferences for novel proteins lacking binding data.

Conclusions:

  • This study presents an economical and practical solution for determining RBP sequence preferences, especially for understudied proteins.
  • The co-evolution-based method eliminates the need for expensive and time-consuming experimental data.
  • The developed source code and datasets are publicly available for broader application.