Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
Published on: June 5, 2020
Assessing clinical reasoning: moving from in vitro to in vivo
Eric S Holmboe1, Steven J Durning2
11American Board of Internal, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract:
The last century saw dramatic changes in clinical practice and medical education and the concomitant rise in high-stakes, psychometrically-based examinations of medical knowledge. Higher scores on these high-stakes "in-vitro" examinations are modestly associated with better performance in clinical practice and provide a meaningful degree of assurance to the public about physicians' competency in medical knowledge. However, results on such examinations explain only a small fraction of the wide variation currently seen in clinical practice and diagnostic errors remain a serious and vexing problem for patients and the healthcare system despite decades of high-stakes examinations. In this commentary we explore some of the limitations of high-stakes examinations in assessing clinical reasoning and propose utilizing situated cognition theory to guide research and development of innovative modes of "in-vivo" assessments that can be used in longitudinally and continuously in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Reason and Intuition
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

