The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria

Javad Parvizi1, Timothy L Tan1, Karan Goswami1

  • 1Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Abstract

Insights

An updated evidence-based definition for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) shows improved sensitivity and specificity. These new criteria enhance diagnostic accuracy for hip and knee PJI, aiding clinical decisions and research.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Diagnostic Criteria Development

Background:

  • The 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria improved periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis and research collaboration.
  • Advancements in diagnostic tests and experience with MSIS criteria necessitated an updated, evidence-based definition for PJI.
  • Previous diagnostic criteria required refinement to enhance accuracy in identifying PJI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an updated, evidence-based definition for diagnosing hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
  • To integrate new diagnostic markers and refine existing ones for improved PJI detection.
  • To compare the performance of the new criteria against established MSIS and International Consensus Meeting definitions.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-institutional study involving patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty.
  • Development of new criteria using random forest analysis and multivariate regression on defined PJI (n=684) and aseptic (n=820) cohorts.
  • Validation of the new definition on an external cohort (222 PJI, 200 aseptic patients) and comparison with existing criteria.

Main Results:

  • New criteria assign weighted scores to serum markers (CRP, D-dimer, ESR), synovial fluid analysis (WBC, alpha-defensin, LE, PMN%, synovial CRP), and intraoperative findings (histology, purulence, culture).
  • A preoperative score of ≥6 indicates infection; scores 2-5 require intraoperative findings. Combined scores of ≥6 confirm infection, 4-5 are inconclusive, ≤3 are not infected.
  • The new criteria achieved 97.7% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity, outperforming MSIS (79.3% sensitivity) and International Consensus Meeting definitions.

Conclusions:

  • An evidence-based definition for diagnosing hip and knee PJI has been developed.
  • The new criteria demonstrate excellent performance, with significantly higher sensitivity than previous definitions.
  • Formal external validation confirms the utility of the updated PJI diagnostic criteria.

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.4K
Acid–Base Equilibria: Activity-Based Definition of pH01:10

Acid–Base Equilibria: Activity-Based Definition of pH

For an ideal solution, the pH is defined as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. For a non-ideal solution, an accurate measurement of the pH must consider the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity rather than concentration. In such a solution, the pH can be more accurately defined as the negative logarithm of a product of the hydrogen ion concentration and its activity coefficient.
In solutions of very low ionic strength—for example, pure water—the...
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.1K
Definite Integral01:29

Definite Integral

Consider a real-valued function defined on a closed interval. One of the fundamental objectives in calculus is to determine the area under the graph of such a function. When an exact computation is not readily available, this area can be estimated by dividing the interval into a finite number of equal subintervals. Each subinterval corresponds to a rectangle whose width is the length of the subinterval and whose height is determined by the value of the function at a selected point within that...
81