Predicting Adverse Perioperative Events in Patients Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair

Marten N Basta1, John E Fiadjoe2, Albert S Woo1

  • 11 Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.

Insights

Adverse perioperative events (APEs) occurred in 23% of patients undergoing cleft palatoplasty. An individualized risk assessment tool identified extreme-risk patients with a 37-fold higher APE incidence, aiding clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Anesthesiology
  • Craniofacial Anomalies

Background:

  • Cleft palatoplasty is a common surgical procedure in infants.
  • Adverse perioperative events (APEs) can complicate cleft palate repair.
  • Identifying risk factors is crucial for improving patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify risk factors for APEs following cleft palatoplasty.
  • To develop an individualized risk assessment tool for these patients.
  • To enhance perioperative clinical decision-making and mitigate complications.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 300 patients younger than 2 years undergoing primary Furlow palatoplasty.
  • Data collected on patient demographics, cleft type, surgical factors, and perioperative events.
  • Statistical analysis to identify associations between risk factors and APEs, including odds ratios and C-statistics.

Main Results:

  • The overall incidence of APEs was 23.0%, with hypoventilation and airway obstruction being most common.
  • Significant risk factors included multiple intubation attempts, airway anomalies, prolonged operation time, higher narcotic dose, inexperienced provider, and lack of paralytic reversal.
  • A weight between 9 and 13 kg was found to be protective.

Conclusions:

  • An individualized risk assessment tool effectively stratifies patients into low, average, high, or extreme risk categories for APEs.
  • Extreme-risk patients had a 37-fold higher APE incidence.
  • Such tools can significantly improve perioperative management and patient outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
43.8K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
33.9K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
26.4K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.1K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
40.9K
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects01:12

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects

While local anesthetics are generally safe and well-tolerated, they can occasionally cause adverse effects that vary in severity. Local anesthetics can induce toxicity at two distinct levels. They can either produce local effects through direct contact with the neural elements or be absorbed into the bloodstream from the injection site, leading to systemic effects.
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
815