Masked and unmasked error-related potentials during continuous control and feedback
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System
Published on: May 8, 2018
Catarina Lopes Dias1, Andreea I Sburlea, Gernot R Müller-Putz
1Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Abstract:
The detection of error-related potentials (ErrPs) in tasks with discrete feedback is well established in the brain-computer interface (BCI) field. However, the decoding of ErrPs in tasks with continuous feedback is still in its early stages.
Objective:
We developed a task in which subjects have continuous control of a cursor's position by means of a joystick. The cursor's position was shown to the participants in two different modalities of continuous feedback: normal and jittered. The jittered feedback was created to mimic the instability that could exist if participants controlled the trajectory directly with brain signals.
Approach:
This paper studies the electroencephalographic (EEG)-measurable signatures caused by a loss of control over the cursor's trajectory, causing a target miss.
Main Results:
In both feedback modalities, time-locked potentials revealed the typical frontal-central components of error-related potentials. Errors occurring during the jittered feedback (masked errors) were delayed in comparison to errors occurring during normal feedback (unmasked errors). Masked errors displayed lower peak amplitudes than unmasked errors. Time-locked classification analysis allowed a good distinction between correct and error classes (average Cohen-[Formula: see text], average TPR = 81.8% and average TNR = 96.4%). Time-locked classification analysis between masked error and unmasked error classes revealed results at chance level (average Cohen-[Formula: see text], average TPR = 60.9% and average TNR = 58.3%). Afterwards, we performed asynchronous detection of ErrPs, combining both masked and unmasked trials. The asynchronous detection of ErrPs in a simulated online scenario resulted in an average TNR of 84.0% and in an average TPR of 64.9%.
Significance:
The time-locked classification results suggest that the masked and unmasked errors were indistinguishable in terms of classification. The asynchronous classification results suggest that the feedback modality did not hinder the asynchronous detection of ErrPs.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Feedback Inhibition
Controlled-Potential Coulometry: Electrolytic Methods
The chosen potential...
Feedback Loops
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error

