Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

48.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.4K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

33.1K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
33.1K
Eukaryotic Evolution01:24

Eukaryotic Evolution

42.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
42.4K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.8K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

9.2K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.2K
Hybridoma Technology01:31

Hybridoma Technology

17.8K
Hybridoma technology is used for the large-scale production of monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies bind to only a single antigenic determinant or epitope. Such antibodies are used in research, diagnostics, and disease therapy. The hybridoma technology established in 1975 by Georges Köhler and Cesar Milstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1984 for revolutionizing research and therapy.
Hybridoma Selection
Commonly used fusion techniques — electroporation,...
17.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systemic approach to better coordination in science.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Leaving academia: PhD attrition and unhealthy research environments.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices.

F1000Research·2022
Same author

Reply to McGrew: Chimpanzees do not exhibit widespread cultural diffusion.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same journal

Model organism futures in precision toxicology: tracking the emergence of a research repertoire.

Biology & philosophy·2026
Same journal

"Shape is everything: on proteins' functions": Author.

Biology & philosophy·2025
Same journal

A bounded hierarchy framework for the evolution of syntax.

Biology & philosophy·2025
Same journal

What is social constructionism about race? A reply to Hochman.

Biology & philosophy·2025
Same journal

A commitment account of norm externalisation.

Biology & philosophy·2025
Same journal

Evolvability: filling the explanatory gap between adaptedness and the long-term mathematical conception of fitness.

Biology & philosophy·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

10.1K

Complexity and technological evolution: What everybody knows?

Krist Vaesen1,2, Wybo Houkes1

  • 11Department Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Postbox 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Biology & Philosophy
|March 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evidence for increasing technological complexity in human cultural evolution is limited. Current datasets are insufficient and often contradict the technological complexity thesis, necessitating further research.

Keywords:
ComplexityCultural evolutionCultural-evolutionary theoryCumulative cultureTechnology

More Related Videos

Automated Microbial Cultivation and Adaptive Evolution using Microbial Microdroplet Culture System MMC
08:18

Automated Microbial Cultivation and Adaptive Evolution using Microbial Microdroplet Culture System MMC

Published on: February 18, 2022

4.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

10.1K
Automated Microbial Cultivation and Adaptive Evolution using Microbial Microdroplet Culture System MMC
08:18

Automated Microbial Cultivation and Adaptive Evolution using Microbial Microdroplet Culture System MMC

Published on: February 18, 2022

4.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cultural Evolution
  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology

Background:

  • Human cultural evolution is often considered cumulative, with traits increasing in complexity over generations.
  • The technological complexity thesis posits a directional increase in complexity for cultural traits, particularly technology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the evidence supporting the technological complexity thesis in human cultural evolution.
  • To identify limitations in current datasets and theoretical frameworks regarding cultural complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing datasets used to support the technological complexity thesis.
  • Examination of the representativeness and validity of data in cultural evolution studies.

Main Results:

  • Current datasets are insufficient and not representative of human cultural evolution.
  • Available data often support varied or contradictory versions of the complexity thesis, or show no increase.
  • Significant challenges exist in substantiating claims of increasing technological complexity.

Conclusions:

  • There is insufficient credible evidence to support or refute the technological complexity thesis.
  • Future research should focus on developing more robust datasets and methodologies.
  • Re-evaluation of cultural-evolutionary theory is needed in light of data limitations.