Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Jehovah's Witness and consent for blood transfusion in a child: The Indian scenario
K G Gopakumar1, T Priyakumari1, Manjusha Nair1
1Department of Pediatric Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Insights
Indian laws on pediatric blood transfusion consent are unclear, creating ethical and legal challenges for doctors and parents, especially in religious objections. This case highlights the urgent need for clear guidelines on minor consent for blood transfusions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Pediatric Hematology
- Bioethics
Background:
- Current Indian clinical guidelines and laws regarding consent for blood transfusion in minors are insufficient and ambiguous.
- This ambiguity creates uncertainty regarding parental decision-making authority versus a physician's right to decide in the child's best interest.
Observation:
- A case of a child with Burkitt lymphoma from the Jehovah's Witness denomination presented a critical dilemma regarding blood transfusion consent.
- The child's parents faced a difficult decision due to religious beliefs conflicting with standard medical treatment.
- The child experienced complications during treatment, intensifying the medical and medico-legal challenges.
Findings:
- The absence of clear legal frameworks and guidelines made managing the case exceptionally challenging.
- The situation underscored the complexities arising from religious objections to life-saving treatments in minors.
Implications:
- There is a critical need to establish consensus guidelines and laws for elective blood transfusions in minors in India.
- Clearer regulations are essential for transparent, smooth, and legally sound healthcare delivery in pediatric transfusion cases.
- Addressing these legal and ethical gaps is crucial for protecting both patients and healthcare providers.
Abstract:
In India, the clinical guidelines and laws governing consent for blood transfusion in a minor are meager and vague. In an elective situation, whether the parents can make a decision for the child on his/her behalf or whether the doctor has the right to make the decision in the best interests of the child is not clear. We present the case scenario of a child belonging to Jehovah's Witness denomination diagnosed with Burkitt lymphoma. His parents were in a dilemma whether to opt for blood transfusion or not. In the absence of laws and guidelines in this context, and considering the complications that he developed during the treatment period, it was very challenging for us to manage the situation both medically and medico-legally. This situation highlights the need for framing consensus guidelines/laws regarding elective blood transfusion in a minor to make health-care delivery, smooth, transparent and flawless.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...
The ABO Blood Group
Antigens in the ABO Blood Group System
Antigens are substances that can trigger an immune response, leading to the production of antibodies. In the ABO blood group system,...
Rh Blood Group
Blood Typing
Antigens are protein molecules that reside on the surface of red blood cells (RBCs). The ABO and Rh blood typing systems target antigens A,...
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...

