Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction - The Primacy of Randomised
David S Wald1, Jonathan P Bestwick2
1Professor of Cardiology.
Insights
Randomised trials show preventive percutaneous coronary intervention benefits acute ST elevation myocardial infarction patients, while non-randomised studies do not. This highlights the risks of relying on observational data, which can yield misleading conclusions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Research Methodology
Background:
- Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management is critical.
- Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-infarct arteries is debated.
- Evidence synthesis is needed to clarify treatment benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify and assess evidence for preventive PCI in STEMI.
- To compare findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies.
- To evaluate the reliability of different study designs in this context.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies.
- Quantification and assessment of evidence from RCTs.
- Quantification and assessment of evidence from non-randomised studies.
Main Results:
- Randomised trials demonstrate a significant benefit of preventive PCI.
- Non-randomised studies fail to show a similar benefit.
- Discrepancies highlight potential biases in non-randomised data.
Conclusions:
- Randomised trials provide reliable evidence supporting preventive PCI in STEMI.
- Non-randomised studies may offer incorrect conclusions due to confounding factors.
- The primacy of RCTs is crucial for accurate clinical decision-making.
Abstract:
Randomised trials show a benefit of preventive (non-infarct artery) percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, but non-randomised studies do not. The evidence on each is quantified and assessed. The primacy of randomised trials reveals the danger of using non-randomised studies that can, as in this case, give the wrong answer.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Freezing Point Depression and Boiling Point Elevation
The boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapor pressure is equal to ambient atmospheric pressure. Since the vapor pressure of a solution is lowered due to the presence of nonvolatile solutes, it stands to reason that the solution’s boiling point will subsequently be increased. Vapor pressure increases with temperature, and so a solution will require a higher temperature than will pure solvent to achieve any given vapor pressure, including one...
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview

