Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences01:19

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

5.3K
Biostatistics involves the application of statistical techniques to scientific research in health-related fields, including biology and public health. These techniques are essential for designing studies, collecting data, and analyzing it to draw meaningful conclusions. Given the complexity of biological processes, particularly in studies involving human subjects, biostatistical methods are crucial for effectively organizing and interpreting data that might otherwise obscure underlying patterns...
5.3K
Critical Numbers and the Closed Interval Method01:21

Critical Numbers and the Closed Interval Method

72
Understanding the maximum and minimum values of a function is essential for analyzing its overall behavior. These values, often referred to as extrema, provide insight into how a function behaves across its domain. In mathematical terms, extrema can be either local—representing peaks and valleys within a limited region—or absolute, indicating the highest or lowest points over an entire interval.A function’s extrema occur at critical numbers, which are values in the domain...
72
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

4.0K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
4.0K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

13.4K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
13.4K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

10.4K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
10.4K
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

1.2K
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Participants' experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

The participation of lifeworld experts in Delphi processes: A reflection on method and practice.

MethodsX·2025
Same author

Guidelines for Designing and Conducting Delphi Consensus Studies: An Expert Consensus Delphi Study.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2025
Same author

How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.

Systematic reviews·2025
Same author

Delphi studies in social and health sciences-Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Development of a Global Physical Literacy (GloPL) Action Framework: Study protocol for a consensus process.

PloS one·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.5K

[Mixed methods studies in the health sciences. A critical map].

Marlen Niederberger1, Lisa Peter2

  • 1Forschungsmethoden in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention Pädagogische Hochschule Schwäbisch Gmünd, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Deutschland.

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen
|April 2, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Mixed methods studies (MMS) are vital in health sciences for understanding complex phenomena and improving evidence-based clinical practice. This review explores their current use, methodological advancements, and identifies future research needs.

Keywords:
GesundheitswissenschaftenMixed-Methods-Studienmapmixed methods studiespublic healthqualitative Methodenqualitative methodsquantitative Methodenquantitative methodsreviewÜberblick

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.8K
Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
07:20

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies

Published on: January 28, 2014

37.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.5K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.8K
Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
07:20

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies

Published on: January 28, 2014

37.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences Research
  • Methodology

Background:

  • Mixed methods studies (MMS) are increasingly significant in health sciences.
  • Their value includes understanding causal conditions and diverse phenomena.
  • MMS facilitate subject-oriented, evidence-based clinical practice through holistic analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the application of MMS in health sciences.
  • To identify current methodological developments in MMS.
  • To highlight existing research gaps in MMS.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing reviews on MMS in health sciences.
  • Analysis of methodological advancements.
  • Identification of research gaps.

Main Results:

  • MMS offer a multi-perspective approach valuable for clinical practice.
  • Current reviews indicate growing utilization and methodological evolution.
  • Specific areas for future research and methodological refinement were identified.

Conclusions:

  • MMS are a powerful tool in health sciences, enhancing understanding and practice.
  • Continued methodological development is crucial for maximizing the potential of MMS.
  • Addressing identified research gaps will further advance the field.