Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Interposition Graft in Mouse Model
Published on: June 4, 2014
Foreign Body Giant Cell Reaction to a Proplast/Teflon Interpositional Implant: A Case Report and Literature Review
Kevin C Lee1, Sidney B Eisig2, Michael A Perrino3
1Resident, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
After discectomy, interpositional implants (IPIs) are believed to provide temporomandibular joint stability and protect against degenerative joint space remodeling. Alloplastic IPIs gained popularity in the late 1970s because the practice showed early success without donor site morbidity. Unfortunately, these implants were subject to substantial fragmentation resulting in an exuberant foreign body giant cell response that progressively eroded adjacent structures. Most of these alloplastic implants were removed in the years following their recall by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1991, however some remained in circulation. This report describes a case of a failed Proplast/Teflon IPI 27 years after its placement. This case highlights the considerations for managing a patient with a Proplast/Teflon IPI and serves to remind providers that, although increasingly rare, these implants are still present and subject to delayed failure.
After discectomy, interpositional implants (IPIs) are believed to provide temporomandibular joint stability and protect against degenerative joint space remodeling. Alloplastic IPIs gained popularity in the late 1970s because the practice showed early success without donor site morbidity. Unfortunately, these implants were subject to substantial fragmentation resulting in an exuberant foreign body giant cell response that progressively eroded adjacent structures. Most of these alloplastic implants were removed in the years following their recall by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1991, however some remained in circulation. This report describes a case of a failed Proplast/Teflon IPI 27 years after its placement. This case highlights the considerations for managing a patient with a Proplast/Teflon IPI and serves to remind providers that, although increasingly rare, these implants are still present and subject to delayed failure.
More Related Videos
04:55Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Neurons: The Cell Body and the Dendrites
Data Reporting and Recording
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Endergonic and Exergonic Reactions in the Cell