Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges
Published on: June 9, 2023
Infant feeding and growth: putting the horse before the cart
Michael S Kramer1,2, Neil Davies3, Emily Oken4
1Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada.
Insights
Different analysis methods yield conflicting results on infant growth and breastfeeding duration. Experimental approaches suggest no long-term growth differences, while observational methods imply slower growth with prolonged breastfeeding.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Growth Monitoring
- Clinical Trial Analysis
Background:
- Observational studies suggest prolonged breastfeeding is associated with slower infant growth.
- Previous research inferred a causal link between extended breastfeeding and reduced infant weight and length gains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare infant growth outcomes using three distinct analytical methods on data from a randomized trial.
- To investigate infant growth in relation to breastfeeding duration of ≥12 months versus shorter durations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from a cluster-randomized trial promoting breastfeeding.
- Employed three analytical approaches: intention-to-treat (ITT), observational (as fed), and instrumental variable (IV).
- Collected anthropometric measurements at multiple time points from birth to 12 months.
Main Results:
- ITT and IV analyses indicated faster initial growth in the intervention group, with similar growth by 12 months.
- Observational analysis showed higher early growth in infants breastfed ≥12 months, but slower growth later compared to shorter durations.
- Discrepancies highlight the impact of analytical approach on growth trajectory interpretation.
Conclusions:
- Experimental (ITT, IV) and observational analyses yield divergent conclusions on infant feeding and growth.
- The choice of analytical method significantly influences causal inferences regarding breastfeeding and infant growth.
- Emphasizes the critical importance of temporal precedence in establishing causal relationships between feeding and growth.
Background:
Previous observational studies have consistently shown slower weight and length gains in infants with prolonged breastfeeding than in those who were formula-fed from birth or breastfed for a shorter duration. These studies inferred that prolonged breastfeeding causes slower growth in infancy.
Objective:
We compared infant growth associated with ≥12 mo of breastfeeding with a shorter duration of breastfeeding on the basis of 3 different analytic approaches to the same data from a randomized trial: intention-to-treat (ITT; "as randomized"), observational ("as fed"), and instrumental variable (IV; by using randomization as an "instrument" to achieve ≥12 mo of breastfeeding).
Design:
This was a cluster-randomized trial of a breastfeeding-promotion intervention. Anthropometric measurements were obtained at birth and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo.
Results:
The 3 analytic approaches yielded different results. The ITT approach showed more rapid growth in the first 2 mo among infants randomly assigned to the breastfeeding-promotion intervention than among control infants, with a decreasing difference over the ensuing months and nearly identical weight, length, and body mass index by 12 mo. The observational analysis showed a different trend: higher weight and length in infants who were breastfed ≥12 mo than in those who were breastfed <12 mo during the first 3 mo and no difference by 6 mo, while infants who were breastfed <12 mo showed increasingly higher weight and length from 6 to 12 mo. The IV analysis showed a temporal pattern that was similar to that seen in the ITT analysis, but with larger (and less precise) differences between infants breastfed for ≥12 compared with <12 mo.
Conclusions:
We observed major differences in experimental (ITT and IV) compared with observational approaches to analyzing data obtained from the same children. These approaches lead to opposite causal inferences about the relation between infant feeding and growth and underline the importance of ensuring that the postulated cause (feeding) temporally precedes its hypothesized effect (growth). This trial is registered at http://www.isrctn.org/ as ISRCTN37687716.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Population Growth
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Meristems and Plant Growth
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...

