Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Progression-regression effects in tracking repeated patterns.

R J Jagacinski1, S Hah

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Application of signal detection theory to perceptual-motor skills.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythms independently?

Journal of motor behavior·2009
Same author

Dynamic, stochastic, and topological aspects of polyrhythmic performance.

Journal of motor behavior·2000
Same author

A dynamical systems approach to manual tracking performance.

Journal of motor behavior·2000
Same author

Quantifying the performance limitations of older and younger adults in a target acquisition task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998
Same author

Tempo, Rhythm, and Aging in Golf.

Journal of motor behavior·1997
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that practice improves compensatory tracking by enhancing anticipation of movement velocity. However, cognitive tasks interfere with this anticipation, increasing tracking errors.

Area of Science:

  • Human motor control
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Compensatory tracking tasks are crucial for understanding human performance in dynamic control systems.
  • Anticipation plays a key role in minimizing tracking error by reducing effective time delay.
  • The impact of cognitive load on anticipatory mechanisms in motor control requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how practice and concurrent cognitive tasks affect anticipatory control in a position tracking task.
  • To model the changes in cue utilization (velocity) during learning and under cognitive interference.
  • To understand the mechanisms of cognitive interference on motor anticipation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed compensatory tracking of a repeated input pattern using a position control system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tracking error and control movement velocity were analyzed.
  • A concurrent memory task was introduced to assess cognitive interference.
  • Ensemble-averaged trajectories were used to analyze movement patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • Tracking error was proportional to input signal velocity.
    • Practice decreased error magnitude by improving the use of velocity cues for anticipation.
    • A concurrent memory task increased error and reduced the weighting of velocity cues, indicating cognitive interference.
    • Linear models approximated movement patterns, but ensemble-averaged trajectories revealed rapid pulse-like movements.

    Conclusions:

    • Anticipatory control in compensatory tracking improves with practice through enhanced velocity cue utilization.
    • Cognitive interference from a secondary task impairs anticipation, even without direct sensory or motor conflict.
    • The findings suggest cognitive load disrupts the predictive processes essential for efficient motor control.