Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
Published on: March 27, 2012
The ethics of concurrent care for children: A social justice perspective
Kim Mooney-Doyle1, Jessica Keim-Malpass2, Lisa C Lindley3
1University of Maryland, USA.
Insights
Concurrent care for children allows them to receive hospice and curative treatments simultaneously. This policy promotes well-being and equitable access to high-quality end-of-life care for pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Palliative Care
- Health Policy Analysis
- Social Justice in Healthcare
Background:
- Over 40,000 children die annually in the US, many with life-limiting conditions.
- Pediatric end-of-life care faces challenges with symptom management and low hospice utilization (<10%).
- Original hospice regulations posed barriers, requiring discontinuation of curative treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the Concurrent Care Provision through a social justice lens.
- To explore insights into concurrent care policy for end-of-life care.
- To assess the applicability of social justice theory to health policy.
Main Methods:
- Application of Powers and Faden's social justice theory.
- Analysis of the Concurrent Care Provision within the Affordable Care Act.
- Examination of implications for hospice and palliative care clinicians.
Main Results:
- Concurrent care eliminates the conflict between hospice enrollment and curative treatments for eligible children.
- The policy mitigates family tension in choosing essential care options.
- It has the potential to improve end-of-life outcomes for children and bereavement outcomes for families.
Conclusions:
- Concurrent care policy is socially just, promoting well-being in vulnerable children and families.
- It addresses inequities in access to high-quality pediatric end-of-life care.
- The policy supports a more equitable and compassionate approach to pediatric hospice and palliative care.
Abstract:
Recent estimates indicate that over 40,000 children die annually in the United States and a majority have life-limiting conditions. Children at end of life require extensive healthcare resources, including multiple hospital readmissions and emergency room visits. Yet, many children still suffer from symptoms at end of life-including fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and anxiety-with less than 10% of these children utilizing hospice care services. A critical barrier to pediatric hospice use was the original federal regulations associated with the hospice care that required a diagnosis of 6 months to live and the discontinuation of all curative treatments. The Concurrent Care Provision of the United States' Affordable Care Act eliminated the need to forgo curative therapies in order to enroll in hospice for children in Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program. Concurrent care for children can help mitigate the tension families experience in choosing between essential forms of care, as well as contribute to improved end-of-life outcomes for the child and possibly bereavement outcomes for the family. Understanding concurrent care for children from a social justice perspective has important advocacy and research implications for hospice and palliative care clinicians providing care for children and their families. We apply Powers and Faden's theory of social justice "as the moral foundation of public health and health policy" to the provision of concurrent care to children near end of life and families in the United States. The goals of applying this theory are to explore additional insights and perspectives into concurrent care policy may provide and to assess the usefulness of this theory when applied to end-of-life health policy. We argue that concurrent care policy is socially just since it has potential to promote well-being in vulnerable children and families and can limit the inequity children at end-of-life experience in access to high-quality hospice care.
Related Concept Videos
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Ethics in Research
Social Proof
Social Scripts
Social Traps
Social Facilitation

