Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Semistructured Interview for Bipolar At Risk States (SIBARS).
Paolo Fusar-Poli1, Andrea De Micheli2, Matteo Rocchetti2
1Early Psychosis: Interventions & Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Center, London, UK; OASIS Service, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, 190 Kennington Lane, London SE11 5DL, UK.
The revised Bipolar At Risk States (BARS) criteria and the new Semistructured Interview of At Risk Bipolar States (SIBARS) show promise for identifying individuals at risk of developing bipolar disorders in clinical high-risk for psychosis services.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The external prognostic accuracy of Bipolar At Risk (BAR) criteria for predicting bipolar disorders is unclear.
- No validated psychometric tools exist for assessing these risk criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of original BAR criteria, revised Bipolar At Risk States (BARS) criteria, and a newly developed Semistructured Interview of At Risk Bipolar States (SIBARS).
- To assess the utility of SIBARS in identifying individuals at risk for bipolar disorders within Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) services.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study (n=205) evaluating BAR and BARS criteria prognostic accuracy (Harrell's C) for bipolar disorder development in CHR-P individuals.
- Prospective cohort study (n=71) externally validating the prognostic accuracy and clinical utility of the SIBARS in an independent CHR-P cohort.
Main Results:
- Original BAR criteria showed poor prognostic accuracy (Harrell's C=0.659) despite increased bipolar disorder risk (HR=5.30).
- Revised BARS criteria demonstrated adequate prognostic accuracy (Harrell's C=0.777) with a significantly higher risk (HR=12.364).
- SIBARS criteria achieved adequate prognostic accuracy (Harrell's C=0.742) and clinical utility in the prospective validation.
Conclusions:
- The revised BARS criteria offer improved prognostic accuracy over original BAR criteria for bipolar disorder prediction in CHR-P individuals.
- The SIBARS is a promising tool for detecting individuals at risk of developing bipolar disorders within CHR-P services, demonstrating adequate prognostic accuracy and clinical utility.
Related Concept Videos
Bipolar Disorder
Bipolar Junction Transistor
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Case Studies

