Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy as a Unique Probe for Lipid Membrane Dynamics and Membrane-Protein Interactions
Published on: May 27, 2021
Probing long-range spin-spin coupling constants in 2-halo-substituted cyclohexanones and cyclohexanethiones: The role
Fátima M P de Rezende1, Matheus P Freitas1, Teodorico C Ramalho1,2
1Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, 37200-000, MG, Brazil.
Abstract:
Earlier studies with 2-bromocyclohexanone demonstrated a measurable long-range coupling constant (4 JH2,H6 ) for the equatorial conformer, although 4 JH2,H4 and 4 JH4,H6 were not observed; as a consequence, it is inferred that the carbonyl group plays an important role particularly due to hyperconjugative interactions σC2H2 →π*C═O and σC6H6 →π*C═O. In the present study, NBO analysis and coupling constant calculations were performed to cyclohexanone and cyclohexanethione alpha substituted with F, Cl, and Br, aiming to evaluate the halogen effect and acceptor character of the π* orbital on the long-range coupling pathway. The σC2H2 →π*C1═Y and σC6H6 →π*C1═Y (Y═O and S) hyperconjugative interactions for the equatorial conformer indeed contribute for the 4 JH2,H6 transmission mechanism. Surprisingly, the 4 JH2,H6 value is higher for the carbonyl compounds, although the interactions σC2H2 →π*C═Y and σC6H6 →π*C═Y are more efficient for the thiocarbonyl compounds. Accordingly, the Fermi contact (FC) contribution for the thiocarbonyl compounds decays deeper than in ketones, thus reducing more the 4 JH2,H6 values. Moreover, both πC═S →σ*C─X and πC═S →σ*C─H interactions seem to be stronger in thiocarbonyl than in carbonylic compounds. The implicit solvent effect (DMSO and water) on the coupling constant values was negligible when compared with the gas phase. On the other hand, an explicit solvent effect was found and 4 JH2,H6 for the thiocarbonyl compounds appeared to be more sensitive than for the cyclohexanones.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin
Atomic nuclei have a net nuclear spin, , which can have an integer or half-integer value. In atomic nuclei, the spins of protons are paired against each other but not with neutrons, and vice versa. Consequently, an even number of protons does not contribute to...

