Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
Published on: March 10, 2021
The waxing and waning of mnemic neglect
Bettina Zengel1, Brett M Wells2, John J Skowronski2
1Centre for Research on Self and Identity, Psychology Department, University of Southampton.
Abstract:
The mechanisms underlying mnemic neglect (MN) and the conditions under which it waxes and wanes are not yet fully understood. The research in this article examined conditions during both encoding and recall that could potentially moderate the MN effect and that could provide cues about the cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the effect. Results showed that MN: (a) emerged after recall was delayed (Study 1); (b) could not be attributed to differential behavior looking time (Study 2); (c) did not emerge under cognitive load (Study 3); and (d) was not linked to the perceived extremity, importance, or evaluations of the behaviors. However, how informative the behaviors were perceived for personality may contribute to the effect (Study 4). Finally, results from Study 3 and Study 4 showed that when participants were cognitively occupied during encoding, the MN effect waned. Implications of these collective findings for the MN phenomenon were discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Insights
Mnemic neglect (MN) is reduced when cognitive load is present during encoding or recall. This suggests cognitive load impacts memory recall mechanisms, influencing the mnemic neglect phenomenon.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Memory Studies
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Background:
- Mnemic neglect (MN) is a phenomenon where individuals exhibit reduced recall for behaviors that are perceived as less informative about personality.
- The underlying cognitive mechanisms and modulating factors of MN remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate conditions during encoding and recall that moderate the MN effect.
- To identify cognitive mechanisms contributing to MN.
Main Methods:
- Four studies examined the influence of delayed recall, differential looking time, cognitive load, and perceived behavioral informativeness on MN.
- Studies 3 and 4 specifically manipulated cognitive load during encoding.
Main Results:
- MN emerged with delayed recall but was not due to looking time differences.
- MN was absent under cognitive load.
- Perceived informativeness of behaviors for personality, but not extremity or evaluation, was linked to MN.
- Cognitive occupation during encoding reduced the MN effect.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive load appears to mitigate MN, suggesting its role in the underlying mechanisms.
- The perceived informativeness of behaviors for personality is a key factor in MN.
- Findings provide insights into the conditions that influence and potentially alleviate mnemic neglect.
