Related Experiment Videos
Effectiveness of the 'Girls Active' school-based physical activity programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial
Deirdre M Harrington1, Melanie J Davies2,3,4, Danielle H Bodicoat2,5
1Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. dh204@le.ac.uk.
Summary
The Girls Active program did not increase physical activity in adolescent girls after 14 months. However, some subgroups showed short-term benefits, while others experienced negative effects in specific contexts.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatric Exercise Science
- School-based Interventions
Background:
- Adolescent girls globally exhibit low physical activity (PA) levels.
- The 'Girls Active' program was designed to enhance PA in secondary school girls.
- This study evaluates the effectiveness of the 'Girls Active' intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of the 'Girls Active' program on moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) in adolescent girls.
- To explore secondary outcomes including overall PA, sedentary time, body composition, and psychosocial factors.
- To conduct cost-effectiveness and cost-consequence analyses of the intervention.
Main Methods:
- A cluster randomized controlled trial involving 20 secondary schools in the Midlands, UK.
- 1752 girls aged 11-14 participated, with measurements at baseline, 7, and 14 months.
- Moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) was measured using wrist-worn accelerometers.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in MVPA was observed at 14 months between the intervention and control groups.
- Short-term benefits (7 months) in MVPA were noted, particularly in larger schools and specific ethnic/maturation subgroups.
- Some psychosocial outcomes favored the control group, and cost analyses showed no impact on quality of life or service use.
Conclusions:
- The 'Girls Active' program did not demonstrate a significant effect on 14-month MVPA compared to usual practice.
- Subgroup analyses revealed mixed short-term effects and some negative impacts in specific school sizes.
- The intervention incurred costs without a demonstrable improvement in health-related quality of life or service utilization.