Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

A Rat Carotid Artery Pressure-Controlled Segmental Balloon Injury with Periadventitial Therapeutic Application
Published on: July 9, 2020
Cardiac Surgery, with Synchronous Carotid Angioplasty, our Experience
Carlos Pinto1, Marco Costa2, Hilario Oliveira2
1Centro de Cirurgia Cardiotoracica, CHUC, Portugal.
Insights
Percutaneous treatment of carotid stenosis alongside cardiac surgery is safe and effective. This synchronous approach reduces stroke risk in patients needing heart surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease, often affecting both carotid and coronary arteries.
- Optimal treatment strategy for patients with concurrent carotid stenosis and coronary artery disease requiring cardiac surgery remains debated.
- Surgical carotid endarterectomy is the gold standard, but percutaneous interventions are expanding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present initial results of a synchronous strategy for percutaneous carotid artery treatment followed by cardiac surgery.
- To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this combined approach in reducing cerebrovascular complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 37 patients undergoing synchronous percutaneous carotid treatment and cardiac surgery between July 2013 and August 2017.
- Data collected included demographics, perioperative events, and postoperative outcomes.
- Outcomes assessed included cerebrovascular events (stroke), cardiac complications (acute myocardial infarction), and renal impairment.
Main Results:
- The majority of patients (83.7%) were male, with a mean age of 74 years.
- Carotid angioplasty efficacy was 97.3%. Six patients underwent concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention.
- In-hospital mortality was 5.4%, with one acute myocardial infarction. Renal injury (27%) and atrial fibrillation (19%) were most common. No restenosis was observed during a mean follow-up of 523 days.
Conclusions:
- The synchronous approach of percutaneous carotid stenosis treatment followed by cardiac surgery is feasible and effective.
- This strategy appears to reduce the risk of cerebrovascular complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
- Long-term follow-up and permeability studies are needed to support wider clinical acceptance and potential guideline changes.
Introduction:
The identification of carotid stenosis in patients proposed for coronary artery bypass grafting, proves that atherosclerosis is a systemic disease. In patients with carotid disease and in need of cardiac surgery, there are still questions about the best method of treatment - medical, surgical or percutaneous, the degree of stenosis considered for intervention and the best time for treatment (pre, peri or postoperative heart surgery). The surgical treatment of the carotid stenosis is currently the gold standard. However, percutaneous treatment has expanded its indications. It is our goal to present the initial results of our experience in the implementation of a synchronous strategy for the treatment of percutaneous carotid disease treatment, followed by cardiac surgery.
Methods:
Between July/2013 and August/2017, 37 patients were eligible for this procedure. Demographic, perioperative and postoperative data were collected to evaluate the incidence of cerebrovascular complications (severe stroke, death due to stroke, transient ischemic stroke), cardiac complications (acute myocardial infarction (AMI)), or renal impairment.
Results:
The majority of patients (83.7%) were male, with a mean age of 74 years (51-90). Coronary artery disease was the most prevalent surgical indication (59%). Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking, in this order of magnitude, were the most prevalent risk factors. One patient had documented previous stroke. The efficacy of carotid angioplasty was 97.3%, as in one patient it was impossible due to technical reasons. In six patients, the carotid procedure was associated with percutaneous treatment of coronary disease. The interval between both procedures was 1 hour, in average. In- hospital mortality was 5,4% (2 patients) and 1 AMI was documented. Renal injury and atrial fibrillation were the most common complications, found in 27% and 19%, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 523 days (50-1525 days). Two deaths were documented during follow-up. No re-stenosis was found.
Conclusion:
The approach presented here (percutaneous treatment of carotid stenosis, concomitant treatment of coronary disease and proximity between procedures) is feasible and effective in reducing the risk of cerebrovascular complications in patients in need of cardiac surgery. Long-term follow-up results, associated with permeability studies, may boost this technique for clinical acceptance, with changes in guidelines, in this set of patients.
Related Concept Videos
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
What is an Experiment?
Thomson's e/m Experiment
A particle with charge q, speed v, and mass m enters an area from the top, where the magnetic and electric fields are perpendicular both to the particle's motion and to one another. The magnetic...
Controls in Experiments
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

