Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pigeons' performance in the number-left task: Associative or computational mechanism?

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

Exploring boundary conditions of the single-code/default strategy in pigeons.

Learning & behavior·2024
Same author

On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.

Animal cognition·2024
Same author

Giving time a chance in the midsession reversal task.

Learning & behavior·2023
Same author

Externalizing forgetting: Delay testing in a long operant chamber.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2023
Same author

Searching for nothing: placing zero on the temporal continuum.

Animal cognition·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Temporal and nontemporal control in a midsession reversal task with variable intertrial intervals.

João Queiroz1, Carlos Pinto1, Armando Machado2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|May 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Pigeons in a reversal task showed some temporal control, but it was weaker than predicted. Variable intertrial intervals (ITIs) reduced the influence of timing cues compared to other factors.

Keywords:
generalization decrementintertrial intervalmidsession reversal taskpigeonstiming

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Learning and memory

Background:

  • Pigeons can learn complex tasks, including discrimination reversal.
  • Temporal control, or timing, is a crucial aspect of learning and decision-making.
  • Midsession reversal tasks assess how animals adapt to changing reinforcement contingencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the extent of temporal control in pigeons performing a midsession reversal task.
  • To investigate the influence of variable intertrial intervals (ITIs) on temporal discrimination.
  • To determine if pigeons utilize temporal cues to adjust their choices during the task.

Main Methods:

  • Pigeons were trained on a simultaneous discrimination with reinforcement shifting mid-session (S1 then S2).
  • Variable intertrial intervals (ITIs) were used to separate trials.
  • Test sessions involved altering the mean ITI duration (doubled or halved) to assess temporal control.

Main Results:

  • Pigeons reversed their preference from S1 to S2 around the expected trial number.
  • Changes in ITI duration shifted the reversal point in the predicted direction but with less magnitude than expected.
  • While many choice patterns suggested temporal control, some indicated control by trial number or preceding events.

Conclusions:

  • Pigeons exhibit some temporal control in the midsession reversal task, but it is not the sole determinant of behavior.
  • Variable ITIs may decrease the reliance on temporal cues relative to non-temporal factors.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the interplay of temporal and non-temporal cues in animal learning.