Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Detection of Viruses from Bioaerosols Using Anion Exchange Resin
Published on: August 22, 2018
Optimization of strong-base anion exchange O&M costs for hexavalent chromium treatment
Sarah Plummer1, Craig Gorman2, Tarrah Henrie1
1Corona Environmental Consulting, Newark, CA, USA.
Abstract:
Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] in drinking water is pending regulation in California and is being considered for regulation in other locations. While strong-base anion exchange (SBA-IX) can efficiently remove Cr(VI) to low-levels that may be required to comply with future MCLs, operational and maintenance (O&M) costs can be considerable if the spent brine is disposed of as hazardous waste. Through bench- and pilot-scale experiments and full-scale demonstrations, this study examined the ability of emerging and established brine treatment and reuse techniques as well as recently developed resins to decrease O&M costs. When profiling anion elution during regeneration with nanofiltration treated and untreated spent brine, it appeared that at least 1 and 3 reuse cycles were feasible, respectively. Stannous- and ferrous-based reductants were more efficient than sulfur-based reductants when treating spent brine. Bed volumes to 8 μg/L chromium breakthrough with 7 resins varied by as much as a factor of 2 and correlated (R2 = 0.84) with resin total exchange capacities. Spent brine reuse, segmented regeneration (an optimized brine reuse method), ferrous reduction, and nanofiltration of spent brine were estimated to decrease O&M costs by 30, 70, 63, and 61%, respectively. Selection of high performing resins was the most simple way to decrease O&M costs (up to 70% savings). The sum of nitrate and sulfate raw water equivalent concentrations was found to be the principal water quality parameter that influenced the performance of 4 resins in 7 different groundwaters because nitrate and sulfate concentrations were orders of magnitude greater than chromium concentrations. Resins with higher chromium capacities eluted more co-contaminants including arsenic, selenium, uranium, and vanadium because they likely had higher co-contaminant capacities. Co-contaminant elution was found to be complex because associations can form between regenerant and co-eluting anions. Sodium chloride was the most efficient regenerant, though other regenerants provided benefits such as enhanced uranium elution most likely by complexing with uranium to inhibit its precipitation. Nitrate peaking was found to be limited even when reusing untreated and nanofiltration treated spent brine.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Titration Calculations: Strong Acid - Strong Base
A titration is carried out for 25.00 mL of 0.100 M HCl (strong acid) with 0.100 M of a strong base NaOH. The pH at different volumes of added base solution can be calculated as follows:
(a) Titrant volume = 0 mL. The solution pH is due to the acid ionization of HCl. Because this is a strong acid, the ionization is complete and the hydronium ion molarity is 0.100 M. The pH of the solution is then:
Strong Acid and Base Solutions
Titration of a Strong Acid with a Strong Base
Titration Calculations: Weak Acid - Strong Base
For the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H with 0.100 M NaOH, the reaction can be represented as:
Social Exchange Theory
Titration of a Weak Base with a Strong Acid
Using the ICE table and substituting the Kb value, we calculate the initial pH of 50 mL of 0.1 M ammonia to be 11.11. Addition of 25 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid to this solution of ammonia results in a buffer with an equal concentration of ammonia and ammonium ions. The pH of this buffer can be calculated by substituting these...

