Education as "Dilemmatic Field".

Area of Science:

• Educational Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Pedagogy

Background:

• Educational and developmental psychology have historically diverged, limiting interdisciplinary dialogue.
• Schooling involves complex teaching and learning processes within specific social contexts.
• Educational psychology is often criticized for being overly normative and prescriptive.

Purpose of the Study:

• To argue for the necessity of integrating ethical, political, and societal issues into educational psychology.
• To conceptualize schooling as an inherently ambivalent and dilemmatic field.
• To examine the relationship between socio-economic/political tendencies and personal development within education.

Main Methods:

• Literature review of past and current debates in educational psychology and related fields.
• Conceptual analysis of schooling as a complex social process.
• Critical examination of the normative and prescriptive tendencies in educational psychology.

Main Results:

• Education is inherently ambivalent and dilemmatic, not merely a technical process.
• Educational psychology must engage with broader ethical, political, and societal contexts.
• Schooling's future-oriented nature necessitates critical analysis of current socio-economic and political trends.

Conclusions:

• Educational psychology needs a more holistic and interdisciplinary approach.
• The discipline must acknowledge and address the complex interplay of social forces and individual development.
• Future research should explore the implications of socio-economic and political trends for educational practices and outcomes.