Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Modeling Oral-Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in 3D Organoids
Published on: December 23, 2022
Esophageal carcinoma: Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI parameters and histopathological
Shaocheng Zhu1, Yi Wei2, Feifei Gao1
1Department of Radiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Background:
The pathological grade of esophageal carcinoma is highly determinant of patient prognosis, but it still cannot be adequately evaluated preoperatively. Compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted MRI can separate true molecular diffusion and perfusion in tissues and has been shown to be useful in characterizing malignant tumors. There is no report that compared IVIM and conventional DWI in grading esophageal carcinoma.
Purpose:
To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance of conventional DWI and IVIM models in differentiating the pathological differentiated grade of esophageal carcinoma.
Study Type:
Prospective.
Population:
A cohort comprising 81 patients with newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between December 2015 and August 2017 were evaluated.
Field Strength/Sequence:
3.0T, axial echo-planer imaging, fast spin echo (FSE) sequence, IVIM sequence (b = 0, 20, 50, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200).
Assessment:
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true ADC (ADCslow ), pseudo ADC (ADCfast ), and perfusion fraction (f) of each tumor were calculated by two independent radiologists. Histopathologic grade was used as the reference standard.
Statistical Tests:
Games-Howell test; diagnostic accuracy; Spearman correlation; intraclass correlation coefficient; and Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.
Results:
ADCslow demonstrated the highest area under curve (AUC) with a value of 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.730-0.904) and 0.816 (95% CI: 0.714-0.893) by two radiologists, followed by ADC with a value of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.646-0.843) and 0.761 (95% CI: 0.653-0.848). Good correlation was obtained between the histologic grade and ADCslow (r(R1) = 0.748, r(R2) = 0.720) and ADC (r(R1) = 0.576, r(R2) = 0.571).
Data Conclusion:
ADCslow and ADC had a significantly higher performance than the ADCfast and f, and ADCslow had a significantly higher performance than the ADC.
Level Of Evidence:
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:253-261.
Related Concept Videos
Diffusion
Diffusion
Correlations
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Correlation
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:

