Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.7K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.3K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

2.6K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.6K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

1.4K
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.4K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

515
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
515

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Imagining and building wise machines: the centrality of AI metacognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to 'If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement' [Cognition 242 (2024) 105646].

Cognition·2025
Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Fragmentation and multithreading of experience in the default-mode network.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A signaling theory of self-handicapping.

Cognition·2025
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.0K

Time in causal structure learning.

Neil R Bramley, Tobias Gerstenberg1, Ralf Mayrhofer2

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 11, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People can infer causal relationships by observing the timing of events. This study shows that both event order and the intervals between events are crucial for understanding cause-and-effect, even with limited data.

More Related Videos

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.0K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Causal Inference
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Research on causal strength judgments often focuses on the time between events.
  • Temporal information, including event order and intervals, plays a role in understanding causality.
  • Previous studies have not fully explored temporal cues in multi-variable causal structure induction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of temporal information in causal structure induction with multiple variables.
  • To differentiate the impact of event order versus temporal intervals on causal judgments.
  • To examine how people integrate evidence from multiple observations and sensitivity to exact event timings.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to explore temporal information in causal structure induction.
  • Experiment 1 focused on one-shot learning.
  • Experiments 2-4 examined the integration of evidence from multiple observations and sensitivity to interval variability and correlation.

Main Results:

  • A Bayesian model accurately predicted participants' judgments, ruling out inconsistent causal structures and favoring those with similar intervals.
  • Participants demonstrated sensitivity to event order and temporal intervals between causally connected components.
  • For the first time, it was shown that interval variability alone can enable accurate causal structure judgments when order cues are ambiguous.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal information, encompassing both event order and interval characteristics, is fundamental for causal structure induction.
  • Bayesian models can effectively capture human causal judgments based on temporal evidence.
  • Interval variability is a significant, previously underappreciated cue for inferring causal structures, especially when event order is uninformative.