Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Frequency and distribution of incidental findings deemed appropriate for S modifier designation on low-dose CT in a
Michael J Reiter1, Allison Nemesure2, Ezemonye Madu1
1Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Purpose:
To describe the frequency, distribution and reporting patterns of incidental findings receiving the Lung-RADS S modifier on low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) among lung cancer screening participants.
Methods:
This retrospective investigation included 581 individuals who received baseline low-dose chest CT for lung cancer screening between October 2013 and June 2017 at a single center. Incidental findings resulting in assignment of Lung-RADS S modifier were recorded as were incidental abnormalities detailed within the body of the radiology report only. A subset of 60 randomly selected CTs was reviewed by a second (blinded) radiologist to evaluate inter-rater variability of Lung-RADS reporting.
Results:
A total of 261 (45%) participants received the Lung-RADS S modifier on baseline CT with 369 incidental findings indicated as potentially clinically significant. Coronary artery calcification was most commonly reported, accounting for 182 of the 369 (49%) findings. An additional 141 incidentalomas of the same types as these 369 findings were described in reports but were not labelled with the S modifier. Therefore, as high as 69% (402 of 581) of participants could have received the S modifier if reporting was uniform. Inter-radiologist concordance of S modifier reporting in a subset of 60 participants was poor (42% agreement, kappa = 0.2).
Conclusions:
Incidental findings are commonly identified on chest CT for lung cancer screening, yet reporting of the S modifier within Lung-RADS is inconsistent. Specific guidelines are necessary to better define potentially clinically significant abnormalities and to improve reporting uniformity.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
08:59Method of Isolated Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in a Rat Model: Lessons Learned from Developing a Rat EVLP Program
Published on: February 25, 2015
Related Concept Videos
What is a Frequency Distribution
Mean From a Frequency Distribution
When such a data set is encountered,...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Construction of Frequency Distribution
First, make a table with two columns—one with the title of the data that needs to be organized, and the other column for frequency. [Draw a third column for tally marks if needed]. Then, take a look at the items given in the data set and decide if an ungrouped frequency distribution table or a grouped frequency distribution table would be more suitable. If there are large sets of different values, then it is...
Percentage Frequency Distribution
The process of making a percentage frequency distribution involves the following few steps: note the total number of observations;...
Relative Frequency Distribution