Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.5K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

46.1K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Legal Decision Biases in GPT: A Comparison with Human Judgment.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Divergent patterns of probabilistic reasoning in humans and GPT-5.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Process evaluation results of FEMuR III randomised controlled trial (RCT), a community-based rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

The Comparison of Human and Machine Performance in Object Recognition.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Safety and efficacy of adjunct dexamethasone in adults with herpes simplex virus encephalitis in the UK (DexEnceph): a multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, phase 3, controlled trial.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

A community-based rehabilitation package following hip fracture: FEMuR III a multi-centre RCT, economic and process evaluation.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Cognitive Strategy-based neuromodulation optimizes neural communication to improve working memory.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K

Model-free and model-based reward prediction errors in EEG.

Thomas D Sambrook1, Ben Hardwick2, Andy J Wills2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom.

Neuroimage
|May 15, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that the brain computes both model-free and model-based reinforcement learning signals. Using EEG, researchers demonstrated model-based reward prediction errors, challenging the idea that these learning systems are separate.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.9K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.9K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reinforcement learning involves model-free and model-based systems with distinct mechanisms.
  • Previously, these systems were assumed to be computationally dissociated in the brain.
  • Recent fMRI studies suggest potential interaction, computing reward prediction errors for both value types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of reinforcement learning systems using EEG.
  • To determine if model-based reward prediction errors exist and interact with model-free signals.
  • To challenge the assumption of computational dissociation between model-based and model-free learning.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was employed to capture high temporal resolution neural activity.
  • The study analyzed neural signals related to reward prediction errors in a reinforcement learning task.
  • EEG data was examined for temporal sequencing of state prediction errors and action value updates.

Main Results:

  • EEG data provided evidence for both model-free and model-based reward prediction errors.
  • The findings indicate a temporal sequence involving state prediction errors and action value updates.
  • Model-based reward prediction errors were demonstrated, challenging prior assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • The brain computes both model-free and model-based reward prediction errors.
  • These findings suggest that model-free and model-based learning systems are not computationally dissociated.
  • The study highlights the utility of EEG for dissecting temporally distinct neural signals in learning.