Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Chronic Constriction of the Sciatic Nerve and Pain Hypersensitivity Testing in Rats
Published on: March 13, 2012
Radical pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis
Shahab Nozohoor1, Maria Johansson1, Bansi Koul1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Insights
Radical pericardiectomy significantly improves survival and functional class in constrictive pericarditis patients compared to sub-total pericardiectomy. This procedure offers better long-term outcomes for patients with this heart condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Chronic constrictive pericarditis impairs cardiac function and patient quality of life.
- Pericardiectomy is a surgical option to treat constrictive pericarditis.
- The extent of pericardiectomy (radical vs. sub-total) may impact patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of radical pericardiectomy versus sub-total pericardiectomy.
- To evaluate the impact of surgical approach on patient survival and functional status.
- To assess long-term outcomes in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 41 patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis from 1991-2016.
- Patients were divided into two groups: radical pericardiectomy (n=24) and sub-total pericardiectomy (n=17).
- Outcomes assessed included early and long-term survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and left ventricular ejection fraction, with 100% follow-up.
Main Results:
- Radical pericardiectomy demonstrated significantly higher 10-year survival rates (94%) compared to sub-total pericardiectomy (55%) (P=0.014).
- In the idiopathic subgroup, radical pericardiectomy also showed increased long-term survival (P=0.001).
- Postoperative functional improvement was superior with radical pericardiectomy, with 85-94% of patients achieving NYHA class I or II up to 25 years versus 53-63% for sub-total pericardiectomy.
Conclusions:
- Radical pericardiectomy is associated with superior long-term survival in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis.
- The radical approach leads to better clinical functional improvement compared to sub-total pericardiectomy.
- This study supports radical pericardiectomy as the preferred surgical strategy for chronic constrictive pericarditis.
Background:
We studied the impact of radical pericardiectomy on early and long-term patient survival, postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis compared to a sub-total pericardiectomy.
Methods:
From 1991 to 2016, 41 patients underwent pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. Sub-total pericardiectomy was performed in 17 (41%) and radical pericardiectomy in 24 (59%) patients. Patients in the two study groups had statistically similar NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac catheterization data. Follow-up was 100% complete with a median time of 4 years.
Results:
Radical pericardiectomy resulted in increased survival rates at 10 years (94%) compared to sub-total pericardiectomy (55%) (P = 0.014). In the idiopathic chronic constrictive pericarditis sub-group, long-term survival rates were also increased after a radical pericardiectomy (P = 0.001). Eighty-five percent of patients after a radical pericardiectomy were in NYHA functional class I or II after 5 years and 94% up to 25 years versus 53% and 63%, respectively, for the sub-total pericardiectomy group.
Conclusions:
Radical pericardiectomy provided superior 10-year survival and clinical functional improvement in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis compared to sub-total pericaridectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Radicals
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals

