Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
High incidence of permanent pacemaker after Cox-maze IV and mitral valve surgery: a nationwide registry-based study
Torbjörn Ivert1, Gabriella Boano2,3, Farkas Vanky2,3
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital and Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Insights
Patients undergoing Cox-maze IV (CMIV) and mitral valve surgery face a higher long-term risk of permanent pacemaker implantation. Sinus node dysfunction is a key reason for late pacemaker needs in CMIV patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia often treated with surgical ablation.
- Mitral valve surgery is frequently performed for valvular heart disease.
- The Cox-maze IV procedure is an advanced surgical ablation technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after Cox-maze IV (CMIV) procedure combined with mitral valve surgery.
- To compare pacemaker implantation rates between CMIV and mitral valve surgery alone in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, nationwide, registry-based analysis of 397 patients undergoing CMIV and mitral valve surgery (2009-2017).
- Comparison with 346 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery without ablation (2014-2017).
- Follow-up extended to September 30, 2022.
Main Results:
- CMIV patients had a doubled adjusted risk of pacemaker implantation after 8 years (HR 1.96).
- Pacemaker implantation rates at 8 years were 27% in CMIV patients vs. 13% in the control group.
- Atrioventricular block was the primary cause for early pacemaker implantation, while sinus node dysfunction led to late implantation in CMIV patients.
Conclusions:
- Concomitant CMIV and mitral valve surgery is associated with a higher rate of postoperative pacemaker implantation.
- Sinus node dysfunction is the predominant indication for late pacemaker implantation in patients who underwent CMIV.
- Careful consideration of pacemaker dependency is warranted for patients undergoing CMIV with mitral valve surgery.
Objectives:
This study evaluated the long-term risk of permanent pacemaker implantation following Cox-maze IV (CMIV) and concurrent mitral valve surgery.
Methods:
A retrospective, nationwide, registry-based analysis was conducted on postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation in 397 patients with symptomatic mitral valve insufficiency and atrial fibrillation who underwent CMIV and mitral valve surgery in Sweden between 2009 and 2017. They were compared to a registry group of 346 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent mitral valve surgery without surgical ablation during 2014-2017. The follow-up ended on 30 September 2022.
Results:
CMIV patients were on average 4 years younger and had lower surgical risk than registry patients. More CMIV patients underwent early (<30 days) pacemaker implantation (13.3% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.002). CMIV patients had a doubled adjusted risk of requiring a pacemaker compared to registry patients after 8 years [HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.27-3.04]. In the CMIV group, 22% (95% CI 18-26%) had a pacemaker by 5 years, increasing to 27% (95% CI 22-31%) by 8 years, compared to 13% (95% CI 10-17%) at both time intervals in the registry group. Atrioventricular block II/III accounted for >60% of early pacemaker indications in both groups, and sinus node dysfunction was the indication for late pacemaker implantation in 48% in the CMIV group.
Conclusions:
Patients undergoing CMIV concomitant with mitral valve surgery have a higher rate of postoperative pacemaker implantation compared to patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing mitral valve surgery alone. Sinus node dysfunction was the main indication for late pacemaker among CMIV patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

