Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

590
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
590
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

588
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
588
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving01:16

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving

513
Consider a lawn roller with a mass of 100 kg, a radius of 0.2 meters, and a radius of gyration of 0.15 meters. A force of 200 N is applied to this roller, angled at 60 degrees from the horizontal plane. What will be the angular acceleration of the lawn roller?
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...
513
Projectile Motion: Example01:18

Projectile Motion: Example

13.6K
The theory of projectile motion is very useful for players of several sports to improve their performance. For example, a javelin thrower needs to throw their javelin in such a way that it travels as far as possible. The javelin thrower takes a short run-up to increase the initial speed of the javelin. The range of a projectile is at its maximum at a 45° angle so javelin throwers try to angle their throw as close to 45° as possible.
When we speak of the range (R) of a projectile on...
13.6K
Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion01:42

Simple Harmonic Motion and Uniform Circular Motion

5.7K
While simple harmonic motion and uniform circular motion may be two separate concepts, they correlate and interlink with each other. Simple harmonic motion is an oscillatory motion in a system where the net force can be described by Hooke's law, while uniform circular motion is the motion of an object in a circular path at constant speed.
There is an easy way to produce simple harmonic motion by using uniform circular motion. For instance, consider a ball attached to a uniformly rotating...
5.7K
Torque Free Motion01:15

Torque Free Motion

822
The torque-free motion refers to the movement of a rigid body in space when no external torques are acting upon it. This type of motion can be observed in environments where there are no external forces or frictions, like in outer space. For example, a rotation of Mars in space is a torque-free motion. Mars is an axisymmetric object, meaning it has an axis of symmetry along which it rotates, designated as the z-axis. The rotating frame of reference is defined such that the center of mass of...
822

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual influence networks in walking crowds.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

Human Crowds as Social Networks: Collective Dynamics of Consensus and Polarization.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Is the neighborhood of interaction in human crowds metric, topological, or visual?

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

Analysis of emergent patterns in crossing flows of pedestrians reveals an invariant of 'stripe' formation in human data.

PLoS computational biology·2022
Same author

The visual coupling between neighbours explains local interactions underlying human 'flocking'.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022
Same author

Effects of visual information on decision making during way-finding in emergency and non-emergency situations.

Collective dynamics·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding
08:20

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: May 1, 2020

7.2K

Local interactions underlying collective motion in human crowds.

Kevin W Rio1, Gregory C Dachner1, William H Warren2

  • 1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|May 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Collective crowd motion emerges from local interactions. Pedestrians align velocity with neighbors, with influence decreasing by distance but not lateral position, forming a bottom-up model.

Keywords:
agent-based modelcollective behaviourcrowd dynamicsflockingpedestrian dynamicsself-organization

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K
Collection Protocol for Human Pancreas
07:49

Collection Protocol for Human Pancreas

Published on: May 23, 2012

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding
08:20

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: May 1, 2020

7.2K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.8K
Collection Protocol for Human Pancreas
07:49

Collection Protocol for Human Pancreas

Published on: May 23, 2012

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Physics
  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Collective behavior in groups like flocks and crowds is often attributed to self-organization driven by local interactions.
  • Understanding these local interactions is crucial for explaining emergent global patterns in collective motion.
  • Previous research indicated pedestrians align their velocity vectors with those of their neighbors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific nature of the interaction neighborhood in human crowds.
  • To determine which neighbors influence a pedestrian's behavior and how.
  • To develop a predictive, bottom-up model of collective crowd motion based on experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three experiments where participants walked in a virtual crowd with manipulated speeds and headings.
  • Analyzed how neighbor position influences pedestrian behavior and how multiple neighbor influences are combined.
  • Developed a mathematical model of the interaction neighborhood, incorporating distance-based decay and weighted averaging.

Main Results:

  • Pedestrian influence is combined linearly and decreases with distance but not lateral position.
  • Neighbor influence decays exponentially to zero by 5 meters.
  • The developed model accurately reproduced experimental data and predicted trajectories in observational crowd data.

Conclusions:

  • Collective crowd motion can be modeled from the bottom up by understanding individual-level interactions.
  • The interaction neighborhood is characterized by distance-dependent, exponentially decaying influence.
  • This study provides the first validated bottom-up model for collective crowd motion, integrating experimental findings.